Higher deductibles, higher out of pocket, and higher premiums. As a cancer survivor, Jeanette from Union, NJ can’t skip doctor visits. These increased rates have put her in an impossible spot.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey
Andy Kim
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes30%
No69%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 32 sponsored · 232 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Shame on Speaker Johnson for preventing House members from negotiating with us to address this crisis. 2/2
New Jersey families need relief NOW. As we approach the end of the month, people are seeing their healthcare costs double, or even triple, and making hard decisions about whether or not they can continue to afford their healthcare. 1/2
My joint statement with Democratic members of New Jersey's Congressional Delegation on Trump's refusal to distribute November SNAP benefits to over 820,000 New Jerseyans, the vast majority of whom are children, seniors, or people with disabilities.
No one has worked harder to stand in the way of people getting the healthcare that they need and the food that they need to not go hungry than Speaker Johnson.
What he's NOT working hard at is his actual job. Shame on him.
Earlier this year, Trump and Congressional Republicans were tripping over themselves to give tax cuts to billionaires.
Where is that urgency when it comes to working families and their healthcare?
It is imperative that we continue to deepen our Indo-Pacific partnerships and alliances as they are an essential source of American power. I’ll be watching to make sure we build on these strengths and drivers of stability and security in the region. 4/4
President Trump said he’ll travel to China next year. I will be watching to ensure that this admin does not make concessions on critical areas like semiconductors and export controls, Taiwan, and other regional security issues that would harm our national security. 3/4
We need open lines of communication with the PRC to responsibly manage the competition between our two countries, but the President went into this meeting with a weak hand of his own making.
We still don’t have any details about whether it did anything to help the American people. 2/4
President Trump met with President Xi this week, but there are a lot of questions about the vague commitments made.
Here’s what I’m watching. THREAD 1/4
We must reject any notion that some public servants are “good” and some are “bad.” They all deserve more respect than Trump is capable of giving them. 3/3
I fully support our public servants and believe we need a re-investment in service in this country. It’s why I’ve introduced the Answer the Call Agenda, a package of legislation that aims to do just this. 2/3
This is incredibly dangerous and a direct attack on nurses, teachers, first responders, and public service workers across the country. 1/3
From the Gateway Tunnel Project to SNAP, Trump is trying to cancel programs to seek political retribution and inflict harm.
This is not democracy – it’s mob boss politics and it’s no way to govern.
There's a $5 billion contingency fund to solve the hunger crisis Trump has manufactured; he's just refusing to use it.
That's why I signed on to the Keep SNAP and WIC Funded Act of 2025 to ensure families don't go hungry due to the actions of this administration.
Trump’s Department of Agriculture is choosing to use food as a political tool, weaponizing it against the people who need it most.
They are choosing to keep Americans hungry.
It’s just plain cruel.
The Trump Administration has been trying to cut and gut SNAP for a long time now.
It should come as no surprise that they aren’t willing to use the $5 billion emergency fund that exists for moments like this to ensure that 40 million people in this country don’t go hungry.
My statement on the newly announced trade deal between the US and South Korea.
Thanks for the great questions on my Reddit AMA yesterday. Loved the opportunity to talk favorite books, high fives vs. fist bumps, and all things music.
Republicans have left the building.
Trump has left the country.
It's clear they're OK if you can't afford healthcare.
It's clear they're OK if federal workers don't get paid.
And, it's clear they're OK if millions of kids go hungry.
It's clear they don't care about you.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 16 / 16