My joint statement with @booker.senate.gov on Alina Habba's resignation as U.S. Attorney for New Jersey.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey
Andy Kim
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 834
Yes31%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 241 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
A few weeks ago, my dad was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s. I won’t lie—it's been incredibly challenging for me and my family.
Now, I’m embarking on a journey to answer the questions so many of us face when it comes to providing care for our loved ones.
I hope you’ll join me.
NJ is home to great innovation and technological advancements.
I'm focused on building an Einstein Corridor, a strategic and interconnected ecosystem that will attract investment, foster innovation, and create opportunities for generations to come.
Donald Trump promised to lower costs, but Americans are struggling to afford healthcare and food.
Trump has made billions since January 20. How much has your family made as Trump profits off the Oval Office?
I'm deeply concerned by this Administration's actions in the Caribbean.
Not only does it continue a trend of lawlessness, but it also is part of Trump's effort to reshape how our military is used – and it's not for the good of the American people.
Monday’s ruling made it clear: New Jersey deserves a U.S. Attorney that works for us, not Donald Trump.
Corruption will keep costing us unless we stand up and fight at every level of government.
Our investment in governing should be for the people, not the well-off and well-connected.
This is exactly why we need a strong and fully empowered Comptroller in NJ who can investigate and stand up to corruption.
Investigations like the one Comptroller Walsh conducted are critical to rooting out corruption and restoring trust in government.
This decision joins a long line of efforts under this administration that put the health of communities across the country at risk.
We must stand up to these attacks and fight to keep vaccines accessible to all Americans.
This isn’t America First, it’s a roadmap to a weaker, less prosperous, and less secure America. 3/3
Not only does the strategy kick the importance of confronting our chief global competitor, China, to page 19, but it would advance a world that Beijing and Moscow would relish while squandering some of our greatest assets. 2/3
This is a vision for the world by Donald Trump built on spheres of influence and culture wars - not one that seeks to actively shape the changing world around us in a manner that advantages the American people. 1/3
Across politics, an anti-corruption movement is growing.
The American people have had enough.
We must stand up against corruption even when it's hard – or not politically advantageous.
From NJ to DC and everywhere in between, Americans deserve a government that works for them, not against them.
Democrat, Republican, or Independent, people are tired of corruption in politics and want a government they can trust.
That's why I'm fighting for an anti-corruption movement that holds our leaders accountable to the people they serve.
People like Cindy in New Jersey and around the country deserve better.
I'm fighting for us to give relief to the millions of families who are facing these ridiculous, skyrocketing healthcare costs.
That's why I helped introduce the bipartisan SAFE Chips Act.
Congress must step up to bolster America’s export control regime which is a critical tool in protecting our national security and technological edge. 2/2
If America is going to maintain our strategic competitiveness and security, we need to enforce guardrails to ensure that our adversaries cannot obtain advanced technologies like high-performance chips only to use them against us. 1/2
Politicians and their billionaire buddies are making millions while your family struggles to pay for healthcare and groceries.
I call it the “Corruption Tax.”
Today, I met with student leaders from New Jersey in the Jobs for America’s Graduates (JAG) program. They shared their stories, the challenges they face, and how JAG has united their community.
Now more than ever, it’s important to invest in the next generation of leaders.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History834 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
834 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17