Andy Kim headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Jersey
Born
July 12, 1982
Age 43
Phone
(202) 224-4744
Office
520 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey

Andy Kim

Andrew Kim is an American politician and former diplomat serving as the junior United States senator from New Jersey since 2024. A member of the Democratic Party, he served from 2019 to 2024 as the U.S. representative from New Jersey's 3rd congressional district.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes30%
No69%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Andy Kim headshot
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 32 sponsored · 232 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Trump’s attacks on federal workers is systematic, but public servants are strong and resilient.   This administration is making their life hell, but they’re ready to fight back because they believe in our democracy.
Terminating the Gateway Tunnel Project means eliminating up to 100,000 jobs in the New Jersey/New York region that would have benefitted from this project.   It’s clear that mob boss Trump doesn’t care about anyone other than himself.
Trump’s cancellation of the Gateway Tunnel Project is absolutely catastrophic, but we have to stand up and fight back.   This isn’t the first time New Jersey’s had to stand up against a mob boss and a bully.
By terminating funding for Gateway, Trump is sending a message with his immature, mob boss antics.   “The message is loud and clear,” said one Jersey union worker, “we take the hit.”
From firing federal workers to cancelling billions of dollars for the Gateway Tunnel Project, people are tired of Trump’s mob boss politics.   This shutdown is just another excuse for Trump to weaponize our government against us.
The Trump Administration doesn’t just break promises; they throw our lives into chaos and steal our money.   New Jersey knows mob bosses, and Trump is a mob boss through and through.
Trump’s termination of funds for Gateway is going to hurt so many families, not to mention our nation’s economy, all for his own political benefit.   It’s mob boss politics, it’s political retribution, and it’s unhinged.
Federal workers are missing their paychecks because Trump and Speaker Johnson decided they’d rather plunge our government into a shutdown than address the healthcare crisis we all face.   Federal workers are still showing up, and we owe them better than they’re being treated right now.
This week, I visited north Jersey and sat down with union workers about the government shutdown and how Trump freezing funds for the Gateway Project impacts them.   More from our conversation coming soon.
People want a solution to the healthcare crisis we’re in. It’s time Republicans come back to the negotiating table so we can work to lower costs, save healthcare, and re-open the government.
Behind the scenes of the next “Diner Talk” installment with @menendez.house.gov and Mayor Grilo. Talking with working people in New Jersey impacted by the freezing of the Gateway Tunnel Project funds and the government shutdown. More to come.
Our democracy can’t be run by mob bosses and people are tired of these intimidation tactics by Trump.   It’s time for the House to come back to work and deliver for the American people.
Federal workers can’t stand to see what’s happening in our country right now.   I spoke to federal workers in New Jersey who told me to hold the line against the lawlessness of this administration, and to continue the fight for people whose lives are on the line.
All across the country, people will be forced to make hard decisions about whether or not they can continue to afford their healthcare, take their kids to the doctor when they’re sick, and seek lifesaving treatment. Lives are on the line in this Republican shutdown. 1/2
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationNOYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16