Andy Kim headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Jersey
Born
July 12, 1982
Age 43
Phone
(202) 224-4744
Office
520 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey

Andy Kim

Andrew Kim is an American politician and former diplomat serving as the junior United States senator from New Jersey since 2024. A member of the Democratic Party, he served from 2019 to 2024 as the U.S. representative from New Jersey's 3rd congressional district.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 772
Yes30%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Andy Kim headshot
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 31 sponsored · 230 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

It was great to meet with Governor Sherrill and the NJ Delegation in DC yesterday! The federal/state partnership is so important when it comes to delivering for NJ, building an Einstein Corridor for innovation, and making our home the #1 place to live, work, and play.
Not another dime to ICE and CBP. There’s been no reforms. No accountability for the death of Renee Good and Alex Pretti. No end to the lawlessness in our streets. You deserve better.
Republicans are working hard to cut another blank check to ICE and CBP with NO reforms.   Americans want affordable health care and housing—NOT billions of their tax dollars funneled to rogue agencies.   I voted NO.
At the State Department, I saw first-hand how our Afghan partners risked their lives to assist the United States and protect our servicemembers. It is cruel and shameful that this administration would send these nationals to a country they’ve never been to where their safety is not guaranteed.
Breaking News: President Trump is said to be in talks to send Afghans who helped the U.S. war effort to the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Reposted bySenator Andy Kim
The President spent more on bombs in ONE WEEK of his war with Iran than we spend in an entire YEAR to help parents afford child care. Trump & RFK Jr. are asking to spend $500B more for war—but they won't increase funding for child care by a cent.
PATTY MURRAY: What happened to childcare in this budget? RFK Jr: Ok, let's talk about childcare then instead of the war MURRAY: Just so it's clear, the president is requesting $1.5t in defense which cuts our non-defense incredibly RFK Jr: It's not my department
Trump sees a “threat” and goes after it with any lever of power he can grasp. It’s the same story time and time again. 

But the “threat” that Trump sees is an organization that’s been at the forefront of the fight for a more equal and just society.
Thank you to Lupus Foundation of America, Lambda Theta Alpha, International Association of Heat and Frost and Allied Workers, Heating Air-Conditioning Refrigeration Distributors International, South Asian Impact Foundation, and Construction Management Association of America for coming out. 2/2
This is insane. All because Donald Trump launched a war with no plan and took away your healthcare. Americans deserve relief now. We’ve paid enough.
I support the call for an urgent investigation into this matter. No matter what neighborhood you live in, you deserve to live in a safe and healthy environment. Anything less than that is unacceptable.
I am demanding an urgent state and federal investigation into a suspected cancer cluster in Keyport, where more than 40 cases, including 28 on one street, have been identified near a toxic landfill that was never properly closed.
There is so much work to be done to make our country less expensive and more affordable for working families.   This work is impossible without an independent Federal Reserve.
Today I met with Rutgers students and listened to their thoughts on Trump’s Iran war, the state of our world, and NJ as a leader in technology and innovation. Bright young minds at Rutgers and across the state are powering the future. Their dedication continues to inspire me!
How will we build the Einstein Corridor? Working with our premiere academic institutions. Enabling research at the federal level. Supercharging innovation. When it comes to tech and innovation, NJ is the place to be.
I met with UFCW members from NJ and heard about the struggles they’re facing including rising grocery store prices, price gouging, and the need for better pay and benefits for union workers.   No one should struggle to buy food or groceries, or take care of themselves and their loved ones.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
772 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-08-01Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114)YESYESMotion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-01End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-41)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-39)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-41)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-38)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 34 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (24-73)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 41 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (27-70)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-49)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-44)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-28Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-39)
2025-07-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-07-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-24End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (48-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-41)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (61-35)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 16Next →