Andy Kim headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Jersey
Born
July 12, 1982
Age 43
Phone
(202) 224-4744
Office
520 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey

Andy Kim

Andrew Kim is an American politician and former diplomat serving as the junior United States senator from New Jersey since 2024. A member of the Democratic Party, he served from 2019 to 2024 as the U.S. representative from New Jersey's 3rd congressional district.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 846
Yes31%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Andy Kim headshot
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 35 sponsored · 245 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Great to speak with @iamunion.bsky.social about the importance of protecting workers across our country! I am proud to fight alongside you to support strong labor protections, workers' rights to unionize, and economic opportunity for all.
Trump is holding the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act – the biggest housing bill in nearly 30 years – hostage because he doesn't care about YOU.
We should all be concerned about this trend.   We can't create economic opportunities here at home if we aren't seen as a reliable partner abroad.   If we're to build a more resilient future, we have to lean into our alliances that will power the future global economy.
Four years ago, the Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade and devastatingly eliminated the constitutional right to an abortion. Today, Americans’ reproductive freedoms remain at risk. We must continue to protect the freedom to decide when, if, and how to start a family.
Americans have been forced into impossible healthcare decisions by this administration. Not having access to insurance is dangerous and it ultimately costs taxpayers more. This is unfortunately only the beginning of the hardship that will come from Trump’s policies.
Today, we passed the biggest housing bill in nearly 30 years – and Senate Democrats got it done.   I'm proud to have played a key role in crafting this bill that will deliver relief to families in NJ and across this country.   Let's build more housing that YOU can afford.
Happy Father’s Day to all the dads out there! More than anything, I love being a dad to my two boys and I’m so grateful to have their love and laughter in my life. I hope you get to spend this day with your loved ones, too.
This week, I met with parents and spouses of the victims of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, FL.   I commend them for their advocacy and their efforts to ensure that no one else has to experience the loss that they did. 1/2
Happy Juneteenth! Today, we celebrate the anniversary of the emancipation of enslaved people in the U.S. and the invaluable contributions Black Americans have made to our society. 1/2
It’s only an opinion by the Trump DoJ, but it could have a devastating impact on the lives of millions of people with disabilities. We cannot let this happen. 2/2
Over the past year and a half I’ve heard from countless members of the disability community who feel targeted by this administration. They’ve seen their healthcare taken away through massive cuts to Medicaid, and now this opinion threatens to strip away their civil and human rights. 1/2
States aren't required to provide community-based care for people with disabilities, new DOJ opinion claims.
The time to invest in these technologies and bolster American quantum leadership is now. We must elevate the importance of harnessing all that quantum has to offer – this legislation is one step in doing so. 2/2
The possibilities of quantum technologies are not abstract or theoretical – they are right in front of us, and without greater financing flexibility, we risk falling behind global competitors like China. 1/2
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
846 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-08Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (66-32)
2025-04-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-32)
2025-04-08Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-04-07End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-39)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept House changesNONOConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (5-94)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48)
2025-04-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-04-03S.J. Res. 26 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26YESNOMotion to Discharge Rejected (15-83)
2025-04-03S.J. Res. 33 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33YESNOMotion to Discharge Rejected (15-82)
2025-04-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-04-03H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (53-42)
2025-04-02H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-02S.J. Res. 37 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-48)
2025-04-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-04-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-01Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-03-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2025-03-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-03-27End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-03-27S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-48)
2025-03-26S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Approve resolutionYESNOJoint Resolution Passed (70-28)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Begin considerationYESNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-26End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 14 / 17Next →