Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Voting Record — 612
Yes46%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 100 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byMike Levin
Trump is trying to resurrect a rejected century old plan to erect something towering in his own image, a 250 foot arch, right at the gateway to Arlington National Cemetery. He claims Congress authorized it a century ago. That claim falls apart the moment you check the record.
That is the “vision” Trump is citing. A design that was rejected almost 95 years ago. Arlington is sacred ground, and no president should be allowed to wall it off with a monument to himself that Congress never approved. wapo.st/4aGwgm0
What Congress actually approved in 1925 was a bridge and two 166 foot columns. Not an arch. The columns were never built. President Hoover scratched them from the plans in 1931 after the Commerce Department warned they could endanger aircraft.
Trump is trying to resurrect a rejected century old plan to erect something towering in his own image, a 250 foot arch, right at the gateway to Arlington National Cemetery. He claims Congress authorized it a century ago. That claim falls apart the moment you check the record.
This is your daily reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs.
It’s easy for the president to say everyone is doing great. It’s easy to wave off the strain families are feeling at the grocery store, the gas pump, the pharmacy counter. It’s easy to not care how Americans are actually making ends meet when you just raked in $2 billion in personal profits.
Grateful to the brave crews battling the Pipeline Fire on Camp Pendleton and thinking of everyone on base. These firefighters are running toward danger and working around the clock to protect our Marines, base families, and surrounding communities. We owe them our deepest thanks.
Every one of these deals demands scrutiny, under oath, with the documents on the table. The American people funded all of it, and they have an absolute right to know whether their government was working for them or quietly enriching Trump, Lutnick, and their families.
Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress refuse to lift a finger. They have oversight power and they are choosing not to use it, because the trail leads to their own president. They are part of a cover-up by inaction.
The New York Times recently identified at least 14 companies with financial ties to the Trump family or Cantor Fitzgerald that were pursuing critical-minerals projects involving the federal government.
Don Jr.’s fund took a stake in Vulcan Elements before the company landed a $620 million Pentagon loan that sent its valuation soaring. Don Jr. and Eric Trump grabbed a 20% stake in a Kazakhstan tungsten project just before it was announced.
His family’s firm was in the financing, and he will not answer a single question about it. This is the third major critical-minerals deal to follow the same pattern, and two of them run straight through the president’s own family.
More corruption in plain sight. The government committed $1.6 billion to a company called USA Rare Earth. The private fundraising tied to that deal was led by Cantor Fitzgerald, the firm Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick ran for 30 years before handing it to his sons.
Republicans in Congress need to wake up and open a full and public investigation. Not into 1 company, but into the entire web. Who across this administration holds a financial stake in the contractors their own agencies pay? Who profited, and by how much, from decisions they had the power to shape?
Trump did neither, and holds stakes in dozens of companies that carry federal contracts, from defense firms to detention operators, and his administration keeps directing public money toward them.
Every modern president before this one either sold off their holdings or used a real blind trust to put a wall between the Oval Office and their portfolio.
A president should never be able to enrich himself through a choice his own government makes. That is the entire reason conflict of interest rules exist in the first place.
President Trump’s own 2025 financial disclosure lists CoreCivic among the stocks he holds. His administration decides how many billions of dollars flow to CoreCivic. When CoreCivic’s stock rises on a government decision, the president personally benefits.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
612 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 13Next →