PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes44%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @RepMikeLevinFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 90 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 23(source)
Rank-and-file agents get fired for this. Their boss sues the reporters who expose it. Patel is dangerously unfit and cannot remain in his role.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 23(source)
The FBI has a zero-tolerance policy for alcohol abuse, and even the newest recruits are held to that strict standard. Instead of owning his conduct or answering the questions raised by his own agents, Patel hit The Atlantic with a $250 million defamation suit.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 22(source)
And while he torches the clean energy buildout here at home, China is racing ahead on solar, wind, batteries, and the supply chains that will define the next century.  Working families will pay for it twice, once at the meter and once when the jobs go overseas. www.notus.org/energy/trump...
Trump Keeps Invoking ‘National Security’ Without Explanation to Get His Way on Energy Projects
Court documents show the administration has provided few details about its national security concerns when acting on coal plants, endangered species, offshore wind farms and more.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 22(source)
That’s because there is no emergency. Only a president abusing his powers to pay back donors and punish industries he dislikes.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 22(source)
Trump is stamping “national security” on every giveaway to Big Oil and Big Coal while refusing to say what the actual security threat is.  In court, his administration cannot produce a single document explaining the supposed threats.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 21(source)
This is your daily reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs.
Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 21(source)
Democrats have pushed basic ICE oversight for months: visible IDs, body cameras, clear warrant standards, and limits on aggressive tactics. These are standard across law enforcement. But House Republicans have refused to agree to any of this. The public deserves to know why ICE is the exception.
Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 21(source)
Here is the truth about President Trump’s tariff mess: the American people got stuck with the bill, and most of us will never see a penny back. 🧵
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 21(source)
Democrats have pushed basic ICE oversight for months: visible IDs, body cameras, clear warrant standards, and limits on aggressive tactics. These are standard across law enforcement. But House Republicans have refused to agree to any of this. The public deserves to know why ICE is the exception.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 21(source)
So let’s be clear about what happened. The president imposed illegal taxes. Families paid the price for over a year. The courts struck them down. Now businesses may get refunds, but working families almost certainly will not. And a new round of tariffs is already on the way.
Trump Administration Takes Steps to Refund $166 Billion in Tariffs
The government debuted a system to repay importers two months after the Supreme Court struck down tariffs at the heart of the president’s trade policy.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 21(source)
Most have made no such promise. Economists expect many businesses to simply pocket the money, especially since the president is already planning new tariffs to replace the illegal ones.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 21(source)
The everyday families who paid higher prices at the checkout counter get nothing. A mom who spent extra on groceries for a year cannot file a claim. A handful of companies, like FedEx and Costco, have said they will try to pass refunds back to customers, and they should be commended. But most?
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 21(source)
In February, the Supreme Court ruled many of Trump’s tariffs were illegal. Now the government has to refund over $166 billion, plus interest piling up at roughly $22 million every single day. Here is the catch. Only the businesses that paid the tariffs can apply for refunds.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 21(source)
In February, the Supreme Court ruled many of Trump’s tariffs were illegal. Now the government has to refund over $166 billion, plus interest piling up at roughly $22 million every single day. Here is the catch. Only the businesses that paid the tariffs can apply for refunds.
Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgApr 21(source)
Here is the truth about President Trump’s tariff mess: the American people got stuck with the bill, and most of us will never see a penny back. 🧵
← Newer postsPosts page 11Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-04-09S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-04-09H. Res. 313 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-04-08H. Res. 294 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-04-07H.R. 1039 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-07H.R. 586 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-01H.R. 1491 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Failed
2025-04-01H. Res. 282 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-03-31H.R. 997 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-31H.R. 517 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-03-27H.R. 1048 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-27H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-03-25H. Res. 242 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-03-25H.R. 1534 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-24H.R. 1326 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-24H.R. 359 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-11H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Passed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-11H.R. 1968 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYES✓Failed
2025-03-11H.R. 1156 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Passed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-03-10H.R. 993 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-10H.R. 901 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-10H.R. 495 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-06H. Res. 189 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-03-06S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-05H. Res. 189 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Failed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)End debate nowNONO✓Passed
2025-03-04H.R. 758 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-03-03H.R. 856 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 9 / 10Next →