And for what?
A tiny amount of oil that wouldn’t meaningfully lower prices or move the needle on energy security.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Our coastal economy (tourism, recreation, small businesses, fishing, etc.) depends on clean water and healthy beaches.
One spill (and it is a matter of when, not if, there eventually would be a spill) would potentially do billions in damage and wipe out livelihoods up and down the coast.
Trump wants to bring offshore drilling back to California for the first time in decades.
Absolutely not.
And the moral case is just as clear. A sovereign democracy was invaded by an authoritarian who believes he can rewrite borders by force. Standing with Ukraine defends our values, protects our allies, and helps prevent a far more dangerous fight for our own service members.
I said it over a year ago: Trump’s plan was always to sell out Zelensky and hand Putin exactly what he wants.
We cannot allow it to happen.
If Putin were to push toward NATO countries, our treaty obligations could put American service members directly in harm’s way.
Reposted byMike Levin
Reposted byMike Levin
Now Trump wants to let Big Oil start drilling off California’s coastline.
And for what?
It won’t lower gas prices. Not now, not ever.
Even the oil companies admit it would take a decade to produce anything meaningful, and even then it would barely move national supply.
I’ll fight any attempt to drill off our shores, and I’ll stand with every Californian who knows our ocean isn’t for sale.
Billions of tons of new carbon pollution isn’t just bad policy, it’s utter madness for a state already battling wildfires, extreme heat, and rising seas.
Only the fossil fuel industry thinks doubling down on this makes sense. Even most local Republicans don’t want offshore drilling in California.
Meanwhile, our coastal economy (tourism, fishing, recreation) brings in tens of BILLIONS every year. Trump’s plan risks all of that for a payday that won’t even show up on a gas receipt.
And let’s not forget the climate math.
California drivers would feel nothing. But our coastline would feel everything. One spill could shut down beaches, kill wildlife, and hammer small businesses. We already lived through this in 2021 in Orange County when a relatively small spill caused chaos.
Now Trump wants to let Big Oil start drilling off California’s coastline.
And for what?
It won’t lower gas prices. Not now, not ever.
Even the oil companies admit it would take a decade to produce anything meaningful, and even then it would barely move national supply.
Reposted byMike Levin
Trump keeps propping up expensive, unreliable coal plants and your energy bills keep rising.
Cheap energy is clean energy. Trump’s fossil fuel obsession makes families pay more. www.lcv.org/blog/how-tru...
Trump keeps propping up expensive, unreliable coal plants and your energy bills keep rising.
Cheap energy is clean energy. Trump’s fossil fuel obsession makes families pay more. www.lcv.org/blog/how-tru...
RFK Jr is hijacking the CDC to promote a long-disproved lie that vaccines cause autism, blindsiding career scientists and shredding decades of evidence.
It's dangerous, puts children at real risk and destroys public trust.
He should resign immediately and should've never been put in this job.
This guts support for low-income students, English learners and kids with disabilities.
It is reckless, ideological vandalism that hurts real families. #TrumpCrushesYourDreams
As a dad with two kids in a Title I public school, I am furious.
Trump is ripping apart the Education Department and handing off billions in critical programs to agencies that have no expertise in educating our most vulnerable kids.
Reposted byMike Levin
The new Republican spending bill has driven ACA premiums through the roof, and healthcare costs are about to hit families across California hard.
Listen to this constituent who shared her story with me.
Reposted byMike Levin
Trump’s attacks on veterans in Congress are dangerous and false. I stand with Reps. Crow, DeLuzio, Goodlander, Houlahan and Senators Kelly and Slotkin.
All are patriots who deserve better than threats.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11