Ronald Reagan liquidated his investments in 1981 and handed them to an independent trustee with no contact and no control.
George H.W. Bush did it.
Bill Clinton did it.
George W. Bush did it.
Barack Obama kept his money in Treasury bonds and owned no stock as president.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
For nearly 50 years, every president separated their personal finances from the office.
Jimmy Carter put his family peanut business in a trust so no one could claim he profited from his decisions.
Donald Trump is the most corrupt president in American history.
It is not close.
The Constitution gives Congress the duty to expose self-dealing like this and hold the executive branch accountable.
Every Republican who took the same oath I did should be asking themselves why they are not doing it.
NVIDIA shares climbed.
So did the value of his personal stake.
Trump bought up to $5 million in NVIDIA stock in February.
This week, he flew the NVIDIA CEO to Beijing on Air Force One.
On day one of the trip, his administration approved NVIDIA chip sales to 10 Chinese companies. 🧵
Reposted byMike Levin
The Speaker of the House just defended members of Congress trading individual stocks. Wrong answer.
Members of Congress should not be trading shares in the companies they regulate and fund. Most Americans figured that out a long time ago.
The Speaker of the House just defended members of Congress trading individual stocks. Wrong answer.
Members of Congress should not be trading shares in the companies they regulate and fund. Most Americans figured that out a long time ago.
Reposted byMike Levin
If this report is true, this is an outrage.
The Judgment Fund pays court judgments against the United States.
It is not Donald Trump’s personal piggy bank. And that is exactly what he is turning it into.
Look at the scheme.
Reposted byMike Levin
10,000 veterans recently lost their homes. 90,000 more are next. Trump says he can’t afford to save them. But he has no problem spending money for a White House ballroom.
You don’t get to salute the flag while throwing veterans into the street to pay for your chandeliers.
10,000 veterans recently lost their homes. 90,000 more are next. Trump says he can’t afford to save them. But he has no problem spending money for a White House ballroom.
You don’t get to salute the flag while throwing veterans into the street to pay for your chandeliers.
Reposted byMike Levin
This is your reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs.
This is your reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs.
And it fits a pattern. This same White House is already using the Judgment Fund to pay off companies to kill American wind projects.
Congress needs to act. The power of the purse belongs to the Congress and the people. Not to one man and his friends.
abcnews.com/US/trump-poi...
Congress controls the purse, not the President. The Judgment Fund was never meant for political payoffs to the President’s friends.
You cannot sue yourself, settle with yourself, and then write yourself a check from the Treasury.
They meet in secret. They keep the names secret. And they hand out $1.7 billion in taxpayer money to January 6 rioters and entities tied to Trump.
It is illegal.
Trump sues his own IRS for $10 billion. Trump controls the IRS. The judge on the case is already asking whether the two sides are even on opposite sides. So Trump cuts a “settlement” with himself. He creates a five-person commission. He picks the members. He can fire them at will.
If this report is true, this is an outrage.
The Judgment Fund pays court judgments against the United States.
It is not Donald Trump’s personal piggy bank. And that is exactly what he is turning it into.
Look at the scheme.
Sounds a lot like “let them eat cake.”
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12