Today, VOTE YES on Prop 50. Texas’ radical gerrymandering leaves us no real choice. This is about fairness and protecting democracy itself.
Take your ballot to a drop box or vote center before 8 PM.
Every vote matters today!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump is selling influence by the square foot.
His billionaire donors helped fund his new $300 million White House ballroom, and together they hold $279 BILLION in federal contracts.
It’s pay-to-play corruption at the highest level.
Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Johnson just said there’s “no point” in bringing the House back to work during the shutdown.
That’s not leadership—it’s surrender.
Compared to Johnson, Kevin McCarthy looks like Profiles in Courage.
Americans deserve leaders who show up, not ones who give up.
www.axios.com/2025/10/29/m...
Mike Johnson just said there’s “no point” in bringing the House back to work during the shutdown.
That’s not leadership—it’s surrender.
Compared to Johnson, Kevin McCarthy looks like Profiles in Courage.
Americans deserve leaders who show up, not ones who give up.
www.axios.com/2025/10/29/m...
Reposted byMike Levin
It’s been over 40 days since House Republicans showed up to work.
While families face rising costs and a government shutdown, Mike Johnson keeps his members home.
Even some in his own party now admit this strategy is a disaster.
Bring everyone back to DC, now!
www.notus.org/house/some-h...
It’s been over 40 days since House Republicans showed up to work.
While families face rising costs and a government shutdown, Mike Johnson keeps his members home.
Even some in his own party now admit this strategy is a disaster.
Bring everyone back to DC, now!
www.notus.org/house/some-h...
Elections should be decided by voters, not politicians rigging the game for Trump’s benefit.
That’s why Prop 50 gives Californians the power to decide if we’ll push back, temporarily, and ensure fair representation across the country.
I voted YES, and I hope you will too.
#CAVoteYesProp50
Reposted byMike Levin
I wish the American people could count on Mike Johnson to put them first, bring House Republicans back to D.C., and end this shutdown.
Instead, the weakest Speaker in American history refuses to exercise independent thought or judgment and lets Trump run the show.
I wish the American people could count on Mike Johnson to put them first, bring House Republicans back to D.C., and end this shutdown.
Instead, the weakest Speaker in American history refuses to exercise independent thought or judgment and lets Trump run the show.
Reposted byMike Levin
The Trump Administration’s HUD plan would gut housing aid for 1,400 people in Orange County alone: seniors, veterans and families who finally got off the streets.
Pulling that support now would be cruel, chaotic, and disastrous for our communities.
The Trump Administration’s HUD plan would gut housing aid for 1,400 people in Orange County alone: seniors, veterans and families who finally got off the streets.
Pulling that support now would be cruel, chaotic, and disastrous for our communities.
Reposted byMike Levin
How can Congress negotiate to reopen the government if Republicans refuse to even show up? For FIVE WEEKS IN A ROW, Mike Johnson has refused to call his members back.
Johnson is the weakest Speaker in American history.
How can Congress negotiate to reopen the government if Republicans refuse to even show up? For FIVE WEEKS IN A ROW, Mike Johnson has refused to call his members back.
Johnson is the weakest Speaker in American history.
They found $40 billion for a bailout to Argentina but can’t find a dime to stop millions of Americans from losing their healthcare.
The Trump Administration is letting ACA tax credits expire, driving premiums up an average of 30%.
America first?
Reposted byMike Levin
Fitzgerald wrote of the careless rich who “smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money.”
A century later, it’s still true, only now the party’s at Mar-a-Lago, while millions are at risk of going hungry. www.independent.co.uk/news/world/a...
Fitzgerald wrote of the careless rich who “smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money.”
A century later, it’s still true, only now the party’s at Mar-a-Lago, while millions are at risk of going hungry. www.independent.co.uk/news/world/a...
Reposted byMike Levin
If Secretary Noem thinks the Coast Guard needs modernization, she should start with the vessels and rescue gear that save lives, not a flying five-star hotel to help herself travel in style.
Because that’s not public service, it’s self-serving corruption.
If Secretary Noem thinks the Coast Guard needs modernization, she should start with the vessels and rescue gear that save lives, not a flying five-star hotel to help herself travel in style.
Because that’s not public service, it’s self-serving corruption.
Reposted byMike Levin
The scariest thing I’ve seen this Halloween?
How much healthcare premiums will increase for working American families if Republicans don’t work with Democrats to keep them affordable.
The scariest thing I’ve seen this Halloween?
How much healthcare premiums will increase for working American families if Republicans don’t work with Democrats to keep them affordable.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.