There’s a global trade war and tariffs, which will hurt almost everybody.
But it's what they're doing with this budget and these taxes that's problematic for you.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1
Greg Landsman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes49%
No50%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align92%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 27 sponsored · 138 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
When more and more money is hoarded at the top, folks in the middle have less to spend.
Even though they're working harder, they still don't have enough money to pay all of their bills. And even if they do, there's no money left over for savings or a vacation.
The economy has been broken for decades, and it has everything to do with the way power and wealth is concentrated.
That's how the tax system works. That's how the regulatory system works. It's broken.
Americans will look back at this moment and realize this is when Trump and congressional Republicans fundamentally broke the economy – even though they ran on fixing it.
How they’re making the problems even worse. 🧵👇🏼
Reposted byCongressman Greg Landsman
NEW: Ohio Rep. Greg Landsman joins @marcelias.bsky.social to discuss how the new GOP budget bill would strip the healthcare of millions, how gerrymandering is driving a divisive Congress and more.
Our postal workers are absolutely essential.
Privatizing or cutting USPS would hurt workers and millions of Americans who rely on it — especially those in rural communities.
Reposted byCongressman Greg Landsman
Trump and House Republicans’ #BillionaireTaxScam will harm families all across the country.
With cuts to health care, energy assistance programs, and clean air and water protections, @repgreglandsman.bsky.social was clear how problematic this will be — all to pay for tax cuts for the ultra-rich.
When you take healthcare from 14 million Americans, which this bill does, people will die.
When you take billions from hospitals, some will close.
This is a terrible bill.
This is the better way forward.
It’s so simple.
Trump could do it.
Congressional Republicans would follow his lead.
Deficit Hawks will love this.
Moderate Republicans worried about taking healthcare away from their constituents will love this.
Americans will love this.
Bottom line: tax relief for everyone who needs it, no one loses their healthcare or food assistance, no cuts to pensions, and no deficit spending.
This would be a very smart, very popular bill.
Fifth, give a small group of Republicans and Democrats a few days to identify actual waste, fraud, and abuse, from the many Government Accountability Office reports.
That way, the bill actually tackles this issue.
Fourth, under this plan, there is no need to mess with pensions for public employees. That provision can be removed.
Most Americans don’t think cutting pensions to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy makes sense.
Third, with the revenue from the simple tax changes they can actually reduce the deficit.
These are basic and very popular changes to the tax code that will only impact the wealthiest Americans and big corporations.
If they pay all their taxes, there will be tax relief for everyone else that needs it. It will be fully paid for.
….Change 3 tax provisions:
1️⃣ Do a simple billionaire minimum tax,
2️⃣ adjust the corporate tax rate a few points,
3️⃣ let the tax cuts for the top wage earners expire.
Second, don’t add trillions to the deficit or take healthcare away from 14 million Americans.
Instead…
First, give tax cuts to everyone who needs it:
➡️ Working folks
➡️ Middle Class families
➡️ Small businesses
➡️ Farmers
Trump is coming to Capitol Hill tomorrow.
What if he told Congressional Republicans the following 🧵👇🏼
This is outrageous, and sets a dangerous precedent. Talk about weaponizing the DOJ. This is beyond and truly scary.
They are criminalizing the constitutional obligation of Members of Congress to provide basic oversight.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History581 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
581 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12