Aliyah is alive because of a breathing tube provided by Medicaid.
Her mother is only able to work because of care provided by Medicaid.
If they shift healthcare costs to the states, she could lose coverage because Ohio can no longer pay for all the care she needs.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1
Greg Landsman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes49%
No50%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align92%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 27 sponsored · 138 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Happy 513 Day SW Ohio 🙏🏻💙
Who doesn’t need health care?!
Millions will lose their coverage so congressional Republicans can pay for tax cuts for the super wealthy.
It’s categorically wrong.
We’re going to fight these healthcare cuts - life and death cuts for millions.
They can walk away from these healthcare cuts simply by requiring that the super wealthy pay their taxes.
HAPPENING NOW: Republicans are putting health care on the chopping block, threatening coverage for millions of Americans.
Democrats are fighting back ⬇️
www.youtube.com/watch?v=xj9I...
We’re in committee right now fighting to save healthcare.
These are the 7 ways congressional Republicans plan to cut healthcare for nearly 14 million Americans.
There are crowds outside of committee chanting, “no cuts to Medicaid”. It’s that simple.
They want into the hearing. There are hundreds of them - advocating as if their lives were on the line…because their lives are on the line.
The episode at this end of this week will be worth the wait — there’s a lot happening. Thank you all 🙏🏻💙
This is a life and death fight. People will die without their healthcare.
We have to win this fight.
They don’t have to do this.
They can pay for tax relief for Americans who need it by making the uber-wealthy pay their taxes. The math is simple. Small changes to taxes for the super wealthy will allow them to strengthen healthcare, not cut it.
7) Reduces the minimum number of nurses at nursing homes.
6) Cuts funding for Planned Parenthood to eliminate basic healthcare like mammograms, birth control, STD testing, etc.
5) Eliminates retroactive Medicaid coverage for nursing homes and emergency room services – they’re eliminating the safety net for people when they need healthcare the most.
4) Shifts healthcare costs to states.
Then -- it bans states from using a provider tax to try and cover the gap in lost coverage.
States won’t be able to cover the gap, and people will lose their healthcare.
3) Cuts subsidies that millions rely on for affordable healthcare – it’s repealing the Affordable Care Act by another name.
2) Adds paperwork and red tape to keep people from getting healthcare, and to kick people off their healthcare.
1) Requires low-income Americans to pay to visit the doctor.
Every time they visit the doctor, they pay money.
We reviewed the bill.
We now know the details on how they plan to cut your healthcare to pay for tax cuts for the uber-wealthy.
7 ways they are cutting healthcare 🧵👇🏼
The chaos and uncertainty of Trump’s tariffs will do real damage to people’s bank accounts, which are already pretty grim for most Americans.
@adammockler.com
“If you’re a corporate lobbyist (or CEO), you made out pretty well in this House Republican tax proposal.”
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History581 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
581 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12