Healthcare, nutrition, education, energy, environment, public safety, and more would also be cut.
Instead, spending goes to people like Elon Musk — the richest man on Earth.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1
Greg Landsman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes48%
No50%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align92%
Cross-party7%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 137 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
So quick recap…
Republicans want to pass a $4.5 TRILLION dumpster fire of a bill.
To pay for it, they are willing to purge millions from their healthcare by making huge cuts to Medicaid.
And adding trillions in deficit spending.
The focus of their bill, which is 🤯, is on the uber-wealthy.
They plan to waste trillions on tax giveaways to Musk and other billionaire donors.
To pay for it, they’re going to add trillions to the deficit and debt AND cut nearly $1 trillion in healthcare for children and seniors.
Absolutely 🥜s
We’re less than a month from a government shutdown. Instead of addressing that, Republicans are bringing to the floor tomorrow arguably one of the worst budget bills ever.
Let me break it down for you, and share where I'm at.
Short answer? Hard, hard for me no.
Long answer 🧵👇🏻
3 years ago, Russia invaded Ukraine.
Congress – Republicans and Democrats— have supported Ukraine for the past three years.
This is a catastrophic path for America.
We stand with democracies, not dictators.
People are angry by what I believe is a hostile takeover of the federal government. Trump and Musk are indiscriminately firing public servants, hacking into our personal data, and trying to cut healthcare for millions to spend on billionaires in more tax giveaways. People are pissed.
We've held over 20 town halls and community conversations. The demand for our first of 2025 was so high that we hosted two this weekend.
The SAVE Act isn’t about election security – it’s about making it harder for Americans to vote.
Finally, it’s unconstitutional. It’s illegal. States like Kansas and Arizona have tried to pass similar bills. They’ve failed.
It would require active-duty service members deployed abroad to return home just so they can register to vote.
If you’ve changed your name, like when you get married, you could be blocked from voting altogether.
It makes voter registration harder for millions of Americans. It would require additional paperwork that a lot of people don’t have on hand -- like their birth certificate.
Non-citizen voting is already illegal. Non-citizens cannot vote, and if they try, they will be deported. They know that.
You’re about to hear all kinds of things about a bill called the SAVE Act.
Congressional Republicans are using it as a cover to take away voting rights from thousands of Americans—all while claiming it’s about stopping non-citizens from voting.
5 things to know 🧵👇🏻
Don’t mess with our letter carriers, or our mail. Fix the economy and lower prices.
Now, more than ever, we need people to work together and stand up to the chaos of Trump and Musk, making things happen for the people we serve.
www.wlwt.com/article/greg...
Bipartisanship is how we’ve kept the government open, passed budgets, and moved legislation forward— it’ll be critical in the months ahead.
Joined Rep. Carey at the Portman Center to talk with students about the bills we’ve worked on together and what the latest budget proposals mean for Ohioans.
It’s not hard to stand up to your own party or president.
I did it with Biden. When you believe they’re wrong, it’s easy.
We just need a few congressional Republicans to stand up to this guy - or at least to stand up to his unelected billionaire tech donor.
When Americans need help the most, their plan is to turn their backs on them.
We broke ground at The Beechwood. 🙏🏼💙
Our team helped secure over a million dollars in funding for this affordable housing project in Avondale, so residents can continue to call this community home.
All 146 units are being upgraded, improving the quality of life for residents.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11