How one of our constituents helped pass the largest expansion to Social Security in decades…
www.cincinnati.com/story/opinio...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1
Greg Landsman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes48%
No50%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align92%
Cross-party7%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 137 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The peaceful transfer of power is core to our democracy and who we are as a nation. We saw that today.
We should work together when we can, fix our economy so hard work pays off, and serve as a firewall to protect those who may be hurt by the worst instincts of the far-right.
An absolutely beautiful person, in every way.
Came to Cincinnati recently and really wanted to see Fiona. We made it happen and that smile when the two met! Amazing.
Her spirit, and of course her lifetime work on behalf of women and reproductive healthcare and freedom, was unmatched.
To hear it directly from him ➡️ www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmtO...
Dr. King gave this speech to a group of students, and it speaks to two incredibly important lessons:
1. Know just how valuable and special you are and
2. when you find your passion, pursue it with excellence.
It’s profound and beautiful and as spot on as it gets…
We joined @energycommerce.bsky.social to fix the economy, protect consumers, protect workers, protect the environment, and make sure government works for you and not the uber-wealthy and well-connected.
The City of Lebanon is celebrating its 215th Anniversary!
I have no patience for who gets credit for the ceasefire deal.
Bring the hostages home. Bring Americans home.
This is just one member of Congress’s opinion, of course, but I do hope it helps us find common ground and a path forward on one of the most complex and complicated issues we face.
Our jails are full.
ICE will continue to remove folks who break the law, but neighborhood sweeps won’t fly in most communities. Plus, who’s paying for this insanely expensive endeavor? Taxpayers? At the expense of disaster relief for our families?
6. Mass deportations would be a strain on limited local resources.
Law enforcement is stretched thin as local funding has been slashed or not kept up with inflation. We want our police patrolling our streets and keeping us safe, not rounding up families and putting them where?
5. If people who have come here unlawfully get arrested for a second crime, they should go home.
Protect DREAMERS who didn’t do anything wrong, but if you break the law – again – you go home.
4. This is bad for a lot of the people coming here.
They’re sleeping in the desert and then on the street or under a bridge. Staying home would have been better for them, especially if there were legal pathways.
3. Our communities are dealing with limited resources and Americans are being hurt. Don’t be xenophobic or hateful, but know it’s a real issue.
Shelters for battered women are often booked for migrant families. We can't put people in this position, so we secure the border first.
2. There is bipartisan support for additional, legal pathways.
American workers should come first, and we should continue to invest in training our people. But when gaps exist, work permits make sense.
Funding judges, which seems to be an issue for the other side, can fix the asylum process: those fleeing danger can apply safely in a second country, & get a hearing within months, not years.
More folks will get to safety legally & fewer will come here unlawfully (and unsafely).
1. We have to secure the border. This should be first, and we can establish real structure and safety for folks.
I still believe the bipartisan deal makes sense: hire more patrol officers and judges and invest in better technology.
The issue of the border and immigration reform isn’t simple, rarely are there moral absolutes, and there are certainly no easy answers.
But we are a nation of immigrants - and a nation of laws - and these two facts should help guide us.
6 ways I think we can do this.🧵⬇️
Praying for the safe return of all hostages, the end of this war, and the beginning of a new chapter leading to sustained peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians.
Hamas must be done, and the international community must work to rebuild Gaza, sideline Iran, and end terror in the region.
Breaking: Israel and Hamas have agreed to a cease-fire deal, opening a pathway to end the 15-month war in the Gaza Strip. https://on.wsj.com/3WlXMOm
I don’t like bullies. Adults should protect children, lift them up, and help them find purpose and belonging.
Subjecting children to physical exams is profoundly inappropriate.
Focus on fixing the economy and improving the lives of children and families. Not this.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 5764 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-20 | H.R. 5763 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.