Trump’s Energy Secretary confirms what we suspected: Trump had no idea what he was talking about when he called for nuclear tests. Is Trump the guy we want controlling the US nuclear arsenal?
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts
Edward J. Markey
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes24%
No75%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align95%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Edward J. Markey
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Edward J.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 131 sponsored · 319 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I’ve asked White House contractor ACECO whether it followed asbestos safety rules during the East Wing demolition. Cutting corners is reckless and a threat to workers and public health. Everyone near the demolition site deserves answers.
On Halloween, you and your children should be able to trick-or-treat without your face being scanned and stored by a doorbell. Amazon’s plan to add facial recognition to Ring is a serious threat to privacy and civil liberties. I’ve called on them to cancel the rollout.
This is a win for the 1.1 million Massachusetts residents who rely on SNAP to put food on the table. But it is only a temporary solution. Trump and Republicans must end their manufactured health and hunger crises and reopen the government.
Reposted bySenator Ed Markey
Live soon — @mayorwu.boston.gov, regional city leaders, and partners share an update on the local response to the potential lapse in SNAP benefits caused by the Trump administration’s decision to allow SNAP to expire on November 1.
Donald Trump is hurling us toward a new nuclear arms race. We don't need a golden ballroom at the White House and we certainly don't need a Golden Dome over the United States. Trump must bring us back from the brink of nuclear catastrophe.
Today, I joined the Journey to Justice tour with Unlock the Box and Look2Justice to say loud and clear:
Solitary confinement is torture.
I’m proud to reintroduce the End Solitary Confinement Act. We must end this cruel and dehumanizing practice once and for all.
Trump’s cruel SNAP cuts are a moral failure—leaving food banks stretched and families desperate. I saw it firsthand at Project Bread in East Boston. Trump and MAGA Republicans are creating a hunger crisis to protect billionaire tax cuts.
By rolling back protections for flyers, USDOT will make flying more painful and expensive. That’s why I’m leading my colleagues calling out Trump’s unpopular, unaffordable agenda.
From health care to groceries to housing – the cost just to live is rising fast. But Trump is focused on ballrooms, billionaire tax cuts, and bailouts of foreign dictators. Let’s bring down these costs, starting by reversing disastrous policies that spike the cost of health care.
BREAKING: Donald Trump just directed the Pentagon to test nuclear weapons before meeting with China.
The US has not conducted a nuclear test since 1992 and we must not resume. This is a reckless decision that will only make us less safe and lead to a new nuclear arms race.
Families in New Bedford and across our Commonwealth are having hard conversations at the kitchen table because Donald Trump won’t come to the negotiating table. Now, Trump and MAGA Republicans are refusing to continue SNAP benefits. They own this hunger emergency.
Public radio is a public good. At a time when polarization is rising and misinformation is rampant, we need to protect public media, not defund it. On #PublicRadioMusicDay, I’m standing with the stations that keep our communities informed, inspired, and connected.
I’m here in Washington fighting to reopen the government so millions of Americans can afford their health care and put food on their table. Where are Speaker Johnson and House Republicans? In a political Witness Protection Program, nowhere to be found.
How much more would you pay for in health insurance in 2026?
What would these rising premium costs mean to you and your family?
Are you considering canceling your health insurance because of these increases?
I want to hear from you.
markey.senate.gov/healthcarecosts
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History789 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
789 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 16 / 16