Edward J. Markey headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Massachusetts
Born
July 11, 1946
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-2742
Office
255 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts

Edward J. Markey

Edward John Markey is an American politician serving as the junior United States senator from the state of Massachusetts, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, he served 20 terms as the U.S. representative for Massachusetts's 7th congressional district from 1976 to 2013. Before that, he was a member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives from 1973 to 1976. When Senator Patrick Leahy retired in 2023, Markey became the dean of New England's Congressional delegation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 789
Yes24%
No75%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align95%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Edward J. Markey headshot
Edward J. Markey
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Edward J.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 132 sponsored · 320 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Small business owners are saying it loud and clear: Trump’s reckless tariffs are squeezing our neighborhood shops. My Small Business Liberation Act is how we fight back—provide relief, end the chaos, and put Main Street first. Let’s get it done.
Trump paid $6 million to El Salvador to imprison migrants from the U.S. in inhumane and cruel conditions. I led my colleagues to demand answers from Secretary Rubio about the legality of this payment. The U.S. must protect human rights, not fund torture. apnews.com/article/sena...
Big Oil spent 100s of millions to elect Trump. In exchange, they're demanding that Republicans destroy the clean energy industry. That's what they're trying to do now in Trump's “big beautiful bill.” Let’s be clear: they’ve never been All of the Above – just Oil above All.
Joe Biden always meets adversity with toughness, resilience, and a deep faith. I’m confident he will battle cancer with everything he’s got. He, Dr. Biden, and their family, are in my thoughts, and I am pulling for his full recovery.
71 years ago, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that segregation is unconstitutional. We are still in the fight to realize true justice and equity in education We must remain steadfast so every child — no matter who they are or where they live — has access to quality education.
Welcome to the Trump FCC: Weaponizing its merger authority to control speech and serve the MAGA agenda – and doing it without a full Commission vote on a Friday afternoon. No transparency.
BREAKING: Today, the FCC approved Verizon’s $20 billion acquisition of Frontier. 

“The transaction will unleash billions of dollars in new infrastructure builds in communities across the country—including rural America.” - Chairman 
@BrendanCarrFCC
Today is Endangered Species Day. Instead of upholding the Endangered Species Act, Trump's @USFWS wants to delete the word "harm” from the regulation, meaning no penalties for destroying critical habitat needed for survival & recovery-the largest rollback of ESA protections ever.
Cutting taxes for billionaires while slashing research funding for diseases that devastate families? Does that make America great? That's the Trump and pedestaled billionaires’ agenda: personal gain and greed over what’s best for our communities.
Cutting FEMA funding while climate disasters intensify is reckless and dangerous. In Massachusetts and across the country, communities depend on FEMA to prepare, rebuild, and recover. This is an administration that will put lives at risk for a quick buck.
Trump gutted @NOAA’s National Weather Service right before hurricane season. Last year, hurricanes cost America $500 billion. Imagine how much more it could be with Trump’s short-sighted cuts that undermine communities’ safety and resilience. www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2025...
Thank you Julie for coming to testify in front of @senatesmallbizdems.bsky.social today. The Senate must pass my Small Business Liberation Act to help owners like Julie and save U.S. manufacturers.
Main Street Alliance / Main Street Action
@mainstreetweets
Julie Robbins of 
@EarthQuakerDev
 is at the 
@SenateSmallBiz
 to tell her #TariffStory.

Unlike companies like 
@Apple
, she doesn't get invites to the 
@WhiteHouse
 to get special exemptions. That's why MSA supports the Small Business Liberation Act.

Let's get it done. #MainStreetPower
We finally recognized the dangers of PFAS chemicals. Now, Trump is nixing @EPA’s draft rule that would limit our exposure, all while slashing funding for safe drinking water. Families will have no idea how many toxic chemicals they’re drinking when they turn on the tap.
RFK Jr. has launched a full-scale attack on our health care. From cutting billions in research for cancer and Alzheimer’s, to slashing funds for community health centers and spreading vaccine misinformation during a measles outbreak—this is their "Make America Sick Agenda."
Im one of hundreds of researchers whose labs are disintegrating overnight.
Julia, Newton, MA
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationNOYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16