This is the latest escalation of the Trump administration’s xenophobic agenda.
Families who have followed every rule are now being thrown into chaos because this administration has chosen to target entire immigrant communities. It’s cruel and fundamentally un-American.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 7
Doris O. Matsui
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes41%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 7
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Doris O. Matsui
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 7
SoupScore
Doris O.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 98 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This week, I joined my colleagues to introduce the Stop Stealing Our Chips Act, to empower and protect whistleblowers and crack down on illegal exports.
America’s AI leadership is too important to lose. We are acting now to protect it. [2/2]
As co-author of the original CHIPS Act, I have continuously led efforts to secure America’s technological future.
Recent attempts to smuggle $160 million in advanced AI chips shows a quickly evolving threat—and we need strong tools to stop theft at the source. [1/2]
Sacramento is a community that protects its neighbors. We stand together. [2/2]
This fight is personal. My family and I lived the consequences of what happens when the government unjustly targets an entire community.
I feel the weight of that history in what is happening to our Afghan community right now. I refuse to let it happen again. [1/2]
In Sacramento, everyone is welcome and deserves every right afforded by the Constitution. I’ll make sure that doesn’t change. [3/3]
This is our city, and as your Representative, I am never going to let this administration, DHS, or ICE get away with terrorizing our neighbors. [2/3]
We are organized, we are unbreakable, and we are a force to be reckoned with when we stand up together.
Today, I stood side by side with @norcalresist.bsky.social and CAIR-SVCC to make it very clear that Sacramento isn’t going to tolerate racist and authoritarian lawlessness. Not now. Not Ever. [1/3]
I urge my colleagues to get serious and work with Democrats on practical, effective solutions that meet this moment and save Americans money. [2/2]
Every year, I lead efforts in Congress to support strong funding for these programs in the annual federal budget because they consistently deliver benefits for families, businesses, and our electric grid.
It’s common sense, and it should be non-partisan. [1/2]
It is becoming clearer by the day just how far the Trump Administration will go to renege on their promise of lowering costs for the American people. [3/3]
Killing the fuel-efficiency standards is a lose-lose-lose situation: losing out on $84 billion in total savings, losing out on 50.4 miles per gallon in fuel efficiency by 2031, and losing out to our foreign competitors who are rapidly innovating in more efficient vehicle technologies. [2/3]
Once again, President Trump and Republicans are choosing to boost profits for oil & gas CEOs, rather than bring down costs for the average American. [1/3]
Now they are threatening to illegally freeze $20B in BEAD funding unless states drop AI safeguards.
Their objective isn’t to improve life for the American people, it’s to enrich their donors. We must never let greed stand in the way of a more modern and connected United States. [2/2]
Trump Administration has thrown federal broadband funding into chaos—freezing funds, forcing states to redo plans, and ripping out affordability protections that help families keep service once the network is built. [1/2]
Through collaboration with NorCal Resist, my office has received troubling reports regarding new ICE activity inside the John Moss Building targeting Afghan asylum seekers living in Sacramento.
I want to be clear about what we know so far and how we are responding. [2/2]
President Trump and Secretary Noem have used incendiary and reckless rhetoric to exploit a national tragedy and target entire immigrant communities. [1/2]
Now our energy grid is being exposed to the same risks as Chinese-made equipment becomes increasingly integrated into our energy infrastructure.
I will not let that happen. Our national security is at stake. [2/2]
As Ranking Member of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, I have led efforts to rip and replace insecure Huawei and ZTE equipment from U.S. telecoms networks. [1/2]
Secretary Hegseth’s illegal use of America’s military force is disgraceful. His actions and behavior have been drastically below the standard of his office from day one. He is dangerous, unfit, and should resign for the sake of the country.
www.politico.com/news/2025/11...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.