DC permits vehicular pursuits with limitations.
Unlike DC, 2% of local police departments prohibit vehicular pursuits altogether.
Rep. Clay Higgins, who's from Louisiana, thinks he knows better than DC how to strike the proper balance in DC.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|District of Columbia at-large
Eleanor Holmes Norton
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 61
Yes15%
No74%
Present0%
Not Voting12%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
At-Large District
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Eleanor Holmes Norton
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratDistrict of Columbia at-large
SoupScore
Eleanor Holmes's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 97 sponsored · 1030 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The substance of this bill is irrelevant, since there is never justification for Congress to legislate on local DC matters. Nevertheless, I'll address it.
Vehicular pursuits are inherently dangerous for participants and bystanders, and police often have other options.
Since Republicans don't trust DC residents with self-government, they should at least address the longstanding vacancy crisis in the local DC courts, which is harming public safety and access to justice.
DC's judicial vacancy crisis isn't due to a failure of the JNC, which meets its deadlines.
It exists because the president, and to a larger extend the Senate, don't prioritize local DC judges, regardless of party.
One seat on DC's highest court has been vacant since 2013.
The JNC provides DC 3 limited roles in the nomination of its local judges.
1) Members of the JNC must be DC residents.
2) DC appoints three of the seven members of the JNC.
3) The JNC's public commend period on applicants allows DC residents to weigh in.
The president, with the advice and consent of the Senate, a chamber in which DC has no representation, appoints judges to the local DC courts from a list of candidates recommended by the DC Judicial Nomination Commission.
I strongly oppose this bill, which eliminates the District of Columbia’s already small role in the selection of its local judges.
The president appoints and Senate confirms local DC judges, selected from a list approved by the DC Judicial Nominating Commission.
Lacking senators, the JNC is DC's only role in the selection of its own judges.
Today Republicans will vote to strip DC of even this small role.
A piece of good news for DC: The text of the CR released yesterday would allow DC to spend its own local funds at its own enacted levels.
The last CR didn't, which resulted in a $1 billion cut to DC's local budget halfway through the fiscal year.
DC residents have all the obligations of citizenship, including paying federal taxes, serving on juries and registering with the Selective Service, yet Congress denies them full self-government and voting representation in Congress.
The only solution is #DCStatehood.
This bill is not only cruel, it is counterproductive.
Most incarcerated people return home. The evidence shows that a minor charged as an adult is more likely to reoffend and be violent after release than a minor charged as a juvenile.
I strongly oppose charging 14-year-olds as adults.
However, whether to amend DC law to reduce or increase the minimum age a minor can be charged as an adult should be a decision for DC alone.
DC is not the only jurisdiction with a so-called young adult offender law.
Alabama, Florida, Michigan, New York, South Carolina and Vermont have such laws.
The sponsor of this bill, Rep. Byron Donalds, represents a district in Florida.
Republicans claim DC’s Youth Rehabilitation Act, which this bill would amend, treats adults as juveniles.
They are wrong. They either do not understand the Act or are misleading the public about it intentionally.
I strongly oppose this undemocratic and paternalistic bill, which amends DC law.
The over 700,000 D.C. residents, the majority of whom are Black and Brown, are capable and worthy of governing themselves.
The hypocrisy and condescension are palpable in the two anti-DC home rule bills the House is voting on today.
I'll speak on both bills today – and I'll forever defend DC's right to govern itself.
#FreeDC
DC Vote continues to fight to preserve DC’s autonomy.
I’m grateful for their leadership and their most recent letter with numerous other national organizations as signatories, opposing any measure that would take away power from DC and calling for #DCStatehood.
I'll speak during debate on all four anti-DC home rule bills the House is voting on this week.
700K DC residents are fully capable of governing themselves, and I'll continue to defend that right – tomorrow, Wednesday, and always.
The memory of America coming together after 9/11, in a time of great loss and collective grief, gives me hope that we're still capable of such unity.
I'll never forget 9/11, the selfless actions of the many first responders, or how inspired I was by the solidarity that followed.
DC is enduring an unparalleled wave of attacks on its autonomy and home rule from the federal government. Yesterday's markup is yet another assault in that barrage.
Republicans in Congress aren't accountable to DC residents and have no business dictating their local laws.
bit.ly/46p8A2K
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History61 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
61 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | H.R. 8469 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-04-30 | H.R. 7567 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 2Next →