For folks asking about the pen, I use Kaweco sports 🖋️
Curious to hear other people’s favorites!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 14
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes37%
No59%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align97%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 14
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 14
SoupScore
Alexandria's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 7 sponsored · 117 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I’ve always wanted to try those!
I’m left handed too! Good paper and quick drying ink are your friends
Kaweco sports are my go-to. I’m left handed and they’ve what I’ve found work best
I’ve tried to make the Pilot Metropolitans work, but they leak on me. I’m probably doing something wrong with them
I just picked it up but I can drop a sample later!
Any fellow stationery heads out there?
Just picked up some new ink 😎🖋️
Thank you Rabbi! Happy you’re here 💕
imo Twitter’s issues started before Musk took over.
But Musk’s leadership has destroyed much beyond recognition, potentially past the point of no return.
The ad issue isn’t “root of all evil,” but it’s a very specific model - a newspaper model - which is different than a more communicative one
I think when the business model is shaped by and results in billionaires, it inherently is both a biz problem and a leadership problem. Also a system problem
But agreed that while tech is important, the biggest issues aren’t necessarily technological. It’s about the decisions that shape the tech
I’m really not sure. I don’t think we’ve seen an incentive model for more communicative sharing yet.
Most platforms are on an ad model. Personal interactions and meaningful engagement don’t really make money for them - distribution does.
There’s a lot of Qs and forks in the road for what’s ahead
Yes, that’s a good point. For users with larger audiences it has become utterly unusable, but I can see it retaining different functionality at different platform sizes
Another impact of the downfall of Twitter / FB is the fragmentation of media.
There are a lot of problems with overly centralized media. But now smaller competitors are less local/indy news and more punditry and propaganda outlets.
Opinions shape one’s “facts” more than facts shape one’s opinions
Not sure.
The way platforms make money determines how spaces are incentivized. We’ve seen how ad spend incentive has impacted many platforms. But that’s not the only one
& if ppl can subscribe to diff algos there’s a potential for siloing that could prevent that broad sampling of convo.
So idk! 🤷🏽♀️
Its**
damn you autocorrect 😩
I’ve been in the crucible enough times to develop an instinct for what resonance feels like (even if it’s not in your favor). You can tell it’s so off.
They have broken the infrastructure for 2 way conversation. It’s just one-way communication and pile ons now. Billboards and crashes. A real shame.
One thing about the bird app’s platform getting totally gamed and manipulated is that where it once was a place for people and decisionmakers to actually try to follow public conversation, it now no longer has that value.
The metrics and engagement are very contrived now.It’s basic purpose is gone
Watched the Bad Bunny fight 🐰🇵🇷
Hey all, welcoming some new friends:
@heatherirobundamd.bsky.social - Bronx OB/GYN who does amazing work w/ maternal health
@aminatou.bsky.social - writer, commentator, Professional Cool Person
@wudan.bsky.social - Seattle based science journalist
@waleedshahid.bsky.social - spox, Justice Dems
Oh shoot sorry !
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H. Res. 313 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-08 | H. Res. 294 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 1039 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-07 | H.R. 586 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H.R. 1491 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-01 | H. Res. 282 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 997 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-31 | H.R. 517 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.R. 1048 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-27 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H. Res. 242 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-25 | H.R. 1534 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 1326 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-24 | H.R. 359 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-11 | H.R. 1156 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.