Gary C. Peters headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Michigan
Born
December 1, 1958
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-6221
Office
724 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Michigan

Gary C. Peters

Voting Record — 903
Yes34%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align95%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Gary C. Peters headshot
Gary C. Peters
U.S. SenatorDemocratMichigan
SoupScore
Gary C.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 83 sponsored · 139 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Happy Hispanic Heritage Month! This month, we celebrate the vibrant culture and significant contributions that our Latino friends, neighbors, and colleagues have made in communities throughout Michigan.
The government threatening to remove a network’s broadcast licenses just because the President doesn’t like its content is state censorship. When Trump and his FCC cronies make these threats, what they’re really attacking is Americans’ 1st Amendment right to free speech and a free press.
Our nation’s debt is alarming, and Trump’s tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy are only making it worse. I took to the Senate floor once again to remind my Republican colleagues of the dangers we face if we do not change course – and do it soon.
Great to have some Michigan @teamsters.bsky.social in the office. Thank you for always bringing Michigan workers’ voices to Washington. I’m with you every step of the way in Congress to ensure fair wages and a better future for working families.
I’m very grateful to law enforcement for responding to these threats quickly. As Americans, we must reject this pattern of violence and do our part to turn the temperature down. Political differences must never lead to violence, and pointing fingers only stokes more hatred and threatens lives.
I’ll never forget how we came together as a nation after the horrific terrorist attacks on 9/11. Today, I’m proud to continue to lead a bipartisan effort to establish "Patriot Week" - which honors the sacrifices made on that dark day. Special thanks to Oakland Co. Judge Warren for his partnership.
On this 24th anniversary of 9/11, may we honor the memory of the 2,977 Americans who lost their lives, the families whose loved ones never came home, and the first responders who selflessly ran into danger. Let us never forget the strength of a united America.
I am praying for Charlie Kirk, his family and the students at Utah Valley University who were impacted by today’s despicable shooting. We must stand against all political violence. It has no place in our democracy.
Many Michigan aerospace manufacturers directly support @NASA's work. But unfortunately this Administration has created a lot of uncertainty about the future of NASA & critical missions like Artemis. These missions drive economic growth & discovery. We must continue to invest in space exploration.
Bill Nye and I agree: the United States must continue to lead the world in science and innovation. NASA is at the heart of that mission, so we can't stop fighting to protect their vital work 🚀
My PROSWIFT Act has helped improve our nation’s ability to predict severe space weather events that could harm us here on Earth. This Administration wants to cut funding for that program, despite it being cost-effective and essential to protecting public safety. I’ll keep fighting back.
Last week I had the chance to stop by the Air Zoo and Flight Innovation Center in Kalamazoo. Those folks are doing some great work to preserve our nation’s history through restoring aircraft and teaching the next generation about aviation.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
903 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-09-24H. Con. Res. 89 (119th)Accept House changesYESYES✓Concurrent Resolution Rejected (49-50)
2026-09-24S. 4668 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (77-23)
2026-09-24S. 4668 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (74-25, 3/5 majority required)
2026-09-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-47)
2026-09-22S. 4668 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (70-21, 3/5 majority required)
2026-09-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2026-09-17—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-45)
2026-09-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2026-09-17S. 4668 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (77-22)
2026-09-15S. 4668 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (74-24, 3/5 majority required)
2026-09-15H.R. 3633 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
2026-09-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2026-09-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-46)
2026-08-08S. 5271 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-08—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-49)
2026-08-08—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-49)
2026-08-08H.R. 6500 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-08H.R. 6500 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Agreed to (61-32)
2026-08-07H.R. 6500 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-07S. Res. 817 (119th)Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2026-08-07H.R. 5334 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-07H.R. 5334 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (32-64)
2026-08-05S.J. Res. 187 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50)
2026-08-05S. Res. 817 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-08-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-44)
2026-08-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2026-08-03H.R. 6500 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-30S. Res. 817 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Resolution Agreed to (50-47)
2026-07-30S.J. Res. 181 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50)
2026-07-30S.J. Res. 199 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-07-29S. Res. 817 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2026-07-29H.R. 5334 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12)
2026-07-28H.R. 5334 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-28—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2026-07-27—End debateNOT_VOTINGNO—Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2026-07-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-44)
2026-07-23—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-47)
2026-07-23S.J. Res. 180 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49)
2026-07-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-22—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-44)
2026-07-22—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (62-36)
2026-07-22—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35)
2026-07-22—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-46)
2026-07-21—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-48)
2026-07-20—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (43-40)
2026-07-16S.J. Res. 198 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-50)
2026-07-16—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-07-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-07-15—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-14S. 4784 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 19Next →