Whenever I read a story like this, I’m reminded of the incredible creativity and outside-the-box thinking happening every day in our district.
Food Fork Lab is more than just a business incubator. They’re a real community hub—one that’s empowering entrepreneurs and invigorating the local economy.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1
Chellie Pingree
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes41%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 163 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Their Energy + Water Appropriations bill (which I'm voting against this week) cuts $2+ million in efficiency funds for Maine—just as we're seeing the biggest surge in energy costs anywhere in the country.
Republicans will do anything to appease Big Oil. Even if it means making life harder for you.
Leave it to a Mainer (who works on an oil rig!) to figure out how to build an affordable, energy-efficient house—and save lots of money in the process.
Instead of helping more Americans access these game-changing tools and technologies, Republicans are trying to sabotage them.
Last night, a Republican colleague asked me, “So, are you guys going to shut down the government?”
Seriously?
Democrats are actually respecting the appropriations process. We’re showing up—and fighting for our constituents.
They're fighting for billionaires.
If there’s a shutdown, it’s on them.
The Republican bill to make the Oversight Committee’s Epstein findings public provides virtually no new information.
I won’t support this political charade.
It’s time to pass the Massie-Khanna bill—and ensure every last page is released.
The victims deserve justice. The public deserves the truth.
I’m hardly a fan of Trump’s trade policies. But ending the de minimis loophole—used by "fast fashion" giants like Shein + Temu to flood the U.S. with low-cost, low-quality, highly toxic, and hard-to-trace clothing—is a good thing.
Not just for the slow fashion movement, but for our planet as well.
Trump has proposed slashing the Park Service by another 30%. That means fewer staff, less maintenance, more safety risks, and a bleak future for our parks—at a time when they’ve never been more popular.
As the top Democrat on the committee that funds our parks, I’m fighting to block these cuts.
Despite near-record visitors this summer, Acadia is straining under Trump’s reckless cuts.
Nearly 40% of staff positions are vacant. Trail maintenance and educational programs have been slashed. Across the country, the Park Service has lost ~25% of its permanent staff.
And more cuts are looming.
From trying to stop Republicans from passing a disastrous energy bill to forcing a vote on the Epstein files, our first week back in Washington is going to be a busy one.
We have our work cut out for us. But Democrats are ready for the fight.
Stay tuned for more updates throughout the week!
Let us continue to build on this legacy, by ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to work with dignity, earn a fair wage, join a union, build a better life for themselves and their families, and create stronger communities.
Happy Labor Day to my fellow Mainers—and to every worker in America.
From Portland's shipyards to the Lewiston mills, from lobstermen + loggers to cooks + housekeepers, workers have been the backbone of Maine’s economy.
Today, we celebrate them—and honor the contributions so many made to improve the lives of all Americans.
Let us never take these gains for granted.
I will be raising these incidents with CPB and the DHS.
Tribal citizens deserve respect for their treaty rights. We cannot allow unnecessary hostility at our northern border to erode the longstanding partnership we share with Canada—or the dignity of those who live in our border communities. (4/4)
Border security is undeniably important. But these hostile actions go far beyond reasonable security measures. They violate fundamental treaty obligations, intimidate law-abiding citizens, and erode the trust and goodwill that have long defined our northern border relationships. (3/4)
In a separate incident, David’s fiancé Angela Daigle, a Canadian citizen with a valid passport, was handcuffed and detained at the border crossing simply because she brought clothing for a planned two-week stay to care for David after he recovered from surgery. (2/4)
🧵
The detention of David Slagger, a disabled U.S. veteran and respected Wabanaki elder—despite his presentation of valid Tribal ID—is deeply troubling.
Denying him access to life-saving insulin, threatening him with force, and refusing to honor his Jay Treaty rights was totally unacceptable. (1/4)
Every worker deserves dignity, respect, and the right to stand together for a better future.
That’s what #LaborDay is meant to honor.
And this President has just shown workers across the country the extent of his disdain for the labor movement.
This is retaliation against the unions that have bravely participated in lawsuits against Trump's anti-worker policies.
Unions have played an indispensable role in protecting workers’ rights, ensuring fair pay, and giving public servants a voice on the job.
How is the president honoring Labor Day this year? By signing an executive order stripping union rights from thousands more federal employees under the pretense of "national security concerns"
That’s what makes Trump’s attacks on FEMA, NOAA + the NWS so enraging. These are the very agencies that are supposed to help us prepare for—and quickly respond to—disasters like Katrina.
They deserve to be fully funded. Not dismantled in service of the president’s extreme, pro-billionaire agenda.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-11 | H. Res. 211 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 993 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 901 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-10 | H.R. 495 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-06 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H. Res. 189 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H. Res. 177 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-04 | H.R. 758 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-03-03 | H.R. 856 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 695 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | H.R. 788 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H. Res. 161 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 818 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.