PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Jack Reed headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Rhode Island
Born
1949
Age 77
Phone
(202) 224-4642
Office
728 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island

Jack Reed

John Francis Reed is an American lawyer and politician serving as the senior United States senator from Rhode Island, a seat he was first elected to in 1996. A member of the Democratic Party, he was the U.S. representative for Rhode Island's 2nd congressional district from 1991 to 1997. Reed graduated from the United States Military Academy and Harvard University, serving in the U.S. Army as an active officer from 1971 to 1979. He is the dean of Rhode Island's congressional delegation since 1999 upon the death of John Chafee.

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes32%
No67%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenJackReedFacebookYouTube
Jack Reed headshot
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 37 sponsored · 157 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 21(source)
From lead pipes to lead paint, raising awareness about dangers of lead poisoning helps build stronger, healthier communities. Proud to champion efforts to boost federal funds to mitigate lead hazards, strengthen clean water infrastructure, & help parents keep kids safe.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 20(source)
Trump is betraying American farmers & taxpayers to prop up his buddy & foreign ideological ally, Argentinian President Javier Milei. Trump’s financial quagmire has no exit strategy, no endgame, & will cost BILLIONS of your tax dollars.
Aaron Rupar
@atrupar.com
Open post ↗
Q: What do you have to say to farmers who feel that the deal is benefitting Argentina more than it is them? TRUMP: Look, Argentina is fighting for its life, young lady. You don't know anything about it. You understand what that means? They are dying
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 17(source)
Proud to deliver federal funds for RI’s new State Health Laboratory. From helping to safeguard our drinking water to monitoring pollution to aiding public safety & criminal investigations through DNA testing, this facility will help make RI safer & healthier.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 15(source)
Higher health care cost increases for next year are already arriving in mailboxes. DC Republicans sure seem to want you to pay hundreds of dollars more per month and get nothing new in return. Dems have a plan to prevent unfair price hikes.
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
Senator Mazie K. Hirono@hirono.senate.govOct 14(source)
It doesn’t matter if you’re in a blue or a red state; health care premiums are set to skyrocket. Democrats are fighting to lower those costs, no matter where you live or who you voted for. Meanwhile, Republicans seem to only care about securing tax breaks for the top 1%.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 14(source)
Pres. Trump wants to keep Argentina’s government open with a $20+ BILLION bailout but refuses to make any effort to protect your health care & get the American government working again.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 14(source)
Democrats are the only ones to offer a concrete plan to reopen the gov't & keep health care prices down. Trump-GOP cut $1 trillion from Medicaid & now millions of Americans will see their health costs skyrocket or lose coverage. Open enrollment is days away. Time to act is now!
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
Congressman Gabe Amo@amo.house.govOct 14(source)
Trump and House Republicans are letting #RI01 small business owners' health care costs skyrocket. @reed.senate.gov and I met with local businesses in Warren to hear how Republicans’ attacks on health care are impacting their livelihoods. This is who we're fighting for in Washington.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 14(source)
The Pentagon press corps plays a vital role in holding military leaders accountable. Hegseth’s effort to censor reporters is an affront to the military’s tradition of integrity and to the First Amendment. www.washingtonpost.com/business/202...
News outlets broadly reject Pentagon rules before deadline for signing
The Washington Post and other major news outlets have refused to sign the Defense Department’s restrictive new media policy, citing First Amendment concerns.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 14(source)
Joined @amo.house.gov to chat w/ local #smallbiz owners this morning & it’s clear: Democrats are fighting to lower health costs for every single American. With just 18 days until open enrollment begins, there’s no time to waste.
U.S. Senator Jack Reed@reed.senate.govOct 9(source)
Time is of the essence. Open enrollment is less than a month away & millions of Americans could soon see their health care premiums double. Democrats have a plan to keep the gov’t open & protect your health care.
← Newer postsPosts page 20Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
772 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-03-13—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-03-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-03-12—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-12—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-03-11—Confirm nomineeNOYES✕Nomination Confirmed (78-19)
2025-03-11—End debateNOYES✕Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20)
2025-03-11—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-03-11—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (67-32)
2025-03-06S. 331 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-06—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30)
2025-03-06—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-06—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-03-05S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 28NONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-03-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 3NONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (70-27)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-03S. 9 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-27—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 35NONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 12 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 10 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 10YESYES✓Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52)
2025-02-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-02-25—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 11NONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (54-44)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42)
2025-02-25—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (66-28)
2025-02-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Accept House changesNONO✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (24-76)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 14 / 16Next →