Deborah K. Ross headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 2
Born
June 20, 1963
Age 62
Phone
(202) 225-3032
Office
1221 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|North Carolina District 2

Deborah K. Ross

Deborah Ross is an American lawyer and politician who has served as the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 2nd congressional district since 2021. Her district is based in Raleigh. A member of the Democratic Party, Ross served as a member of the North Carolina House of Representatives from 2003 to 2013, representing the state's 38th and then 34th House district, including much of northern Raleigh and surrounding suburbs in Wake County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 566
Yes44%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 2

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Deborah K. Ross headshot
Deborah K. Ross
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNorth Carolina District 2
SoupScore
Deborah K.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 169 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

While Republicans slash access to health care for Americans, @usrepkathycastor.bsky.social, @wyden.senate.gov, and I are fighting to improve our country’s health care system. This legislation protects North Carolina families from fraud.
House Republicans' blank check allows Trump and Musk to continue their assault on the funding and services that North Carolinians rely on, including veterans' health care & housing support. These cuts are reckless and cruel. I voted NO.
Our seniors deserve to retire with dignity. My team and I have been hosting mobile office hours to help constituents access resources from the federal government, especially as Donald Trump threatens essential agencies.
This #InternationalWomensDay, we celebrate the women who have broken barriers across North Carolina, the country, and the world. Let's keep fighting for a day where every woman has the opportunity to succeed.
Our law enforcement personnel should be hired based on their qualifications, not their loyalty to one person. Today, @reptedlieu.bsky.social and I led our colleagues in demanding answers from the FBI and DOJ about politically motivated firings at the FBI.
With tax season in full swing, the IRS should be focused on helping Americans—not firing dedicated workers.    Proud to join @doggett.house.gov , @ross.house.gov, and 130+ of my colleagues in condemning these harmful cuts and demanding transparency on how the agency plans to mitigate the fallout.
More than 130 Democrats are condemning the Trump administration’s firing of thousands of IRS employees during tax filing season, saying it may put a dent in compliance efforts and taxpayer service.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
566 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12