How is Kristi Noem paying $270 million for these luxury jets, one of them including a bedroom, full kitchen, and bar? Using YOUR tax dollars.
Instead of dodging questions, Kristi Noem should give the American people an explanation immediately as to why she’s wasting your money.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada
Jacky Rosen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 831
Yes37%
No61%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align90%
Cross-party10%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jacky Rosen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Jacky's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 68 sponsored · 221 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump illegally raised prices on essentials for hardworking families with his tariffs.
Nevadans deserve a refund.
I was glad to meet with City of Henderson leaders, including Mayor Michelle Romero, to discuss projects the city is working on with support from federal funding I helped secure.
I look forward to continuing our partnership to deliver for the Henderson community.
Dozens of Epstein files are missing, including ones containing serious allegations by a survivor against Donald Trump. What is DOJ hiding and who are they protecting?
The survivors of Epstein’s horrific crimes deserve transparency now – just like the bipartisan law we passed in Congress requires.
Kristi Noem is using $70 million of YOUR hard-earned tax dollars to buy luxury jets that include a full kitchen and bar.
You work hard for your money and this is what Kristi Noem is spending it on while you get squeezed by skyrocketing grocery and rent costs.
Here’s the truth: Trump and Washington Republicans slashed Medicaid and let the ACA enhanced premium tax credits expire, and millions of Americans will lose their health care as a result.
Don’t listen to what Trump says about health care – look at what he’s done.
Donald Trump could have spent the last year working to bring down prices for hardworking families. Instead, he’s been focused on lining the pockets of billionaires with more tax breaks. It’s shameful and Nevadans deserve better.
The Supreme Court found Trump’s tariffs illegal last week, and all Trump wants to do is double down and impose MORE cost-raising tariffs.
The American people are tired of paying for Trump’s reckless trade war.
The chaos of cost-raising tariffs is making it harder for Nevada small business owners like Vania to plan for the future.
Nevadans need relief from tariffs — but Trump is doubling down and imposing MORE taxes even after he lost at the Supreme Court.
I'm proud to have Vania Carter-Strauss as my guest for tonight's State of the Union. Vania is a Nurse Practitioner, educator, small business owner, and NV mom who cares deeply about her community.
I'm so grateful to have Vania here with me to highlight the real impact of DC policies on our state.
Trump’s reckless tariffs cost the American people more than $130 billion over the past year. He took money from your pockets, the Supreme Court said it was illegal, and now he wants to keep it.
The American people deserve a refund now.
This is EXACTLY why I pushed the Trump Admin to reverse course on its attempt to no longer classify swastikas and nooses as prohibited hate symbols.
Antisemitism is very real and we need to do everything we can to fight it everywhere. I am glad the Commandant is taking this seriously.
Nevada’s economy relies on international visitors, and when Las Vegas experiences huge declines in visitors thanks to Trump’s reckless actions, our hospitality workers and small businesses pay the price.
The ongoing investigation of former Prince Andrew proves that NO ONE is above the law.
Governments around the world are holding their leaders accountable – the American people and survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s horrific crimes deserve the same transparency.
www.nbcnews.com/world/united...
This week’s Supreme Court ruling rejecting Trump’s cost-raising tariffs is a step in the right direction for hardworking families, but there’s more work to be done. I won’t stop fighting to lower your costs on basic necessities.
The cost of everyday essentials has skyrocketed under Trump’s watch, and Nevada families are struggling to make ends meet. During Trump’s first year in office, families paid $310 more on average just to put food on the table.
Donald Trump LOST at the Supreme Court on his cost-raising tariffs, and his first instinct is to punish YOU by using other authorities to enact even more tariffs.
Instead of allowing costs to go down, Trump is making everything more expensive.
One of my top priorities as your senator is working with both parties to deliver federal funding to our state – and I’m proud to have helped secure nearly $15 million for community projects across Elko County.
Take a look at some of the important projects this funding will support:
Happy Lunar New Year! Wishing happiness, health, peace and prosperity to all in the Year of the Fire Horse.
Majorities in the Senate and the House voted to overturn Trump’s tariffs on Canada – and most Americans disapprove of them too.
Trump should listen to Congress and the American people and sign the resolution to revoke these cost-raising tariffs.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History831 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
831 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17