It may also be the single most important thing the U.S. government can do to bring an end to Russia's war of aggression.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|California
Adam B. Schiff
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 884
Yes31%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Adam B. Schiff
U.S. SenatorDemocratCalifornia
SoupScore
Adam B.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 92 sponsored · 357 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Standing with the Ukrainian people has never been more important than now, as the war reaches a critical turning point.
This bill reaffirms our commitment to Ukraine by enacting the sanctions needed to curtail Russia’s primary source of income and cripple its war effort. 🧵
Trump's judicial nominees are still afraid to say who won the 2020 election.
If they can't rely on the truth to answer a simple question, they can't be trusted to rely on the facts as a judge.
Trump's illegal war with Iran has lasted nearly half a year. What is the status of the war now?
I break down why it's lasted this long and what it has cost the American people.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-6A...
The right to vote belongs to every American, and I will never stop fighting to defend that right.
61 years ago, the Voting Rights Act was signed into law in a historic affirmation of every American’s right to vote.
Today, voting rights are under attack by the Trump administration and its cronies who would rather pick their voters than honor the voice of voters.
We cannot stand by as the health of millions of Americans is on the line.
EPA must rescind its proposal to roll back drinking water protections.
Access to safe drinking water is not a partisan issue — at least not for the American people.
This administration is hellbent on weakening health protections and exposing millions of Americans to toxic chemicals, like PFAS, in drinking water so that others can profit from it. 🧵
To ensure wildlife can safely coexist with humans, Senator Steve Daines and I are introducing legislation that will be a win-win for both the environment and California’s ranchers.
California is home to hundreds of wildlife species – living side-by-side with them requires expanding nonlethal strategies to reduce conflicts.
We cannot let these harmful policies be the reason we forfeit our lead in cutting-edge technology to our competitors.
The United States is the world’s leader in science and innovation, a role we’ve played for more than a century.
The Trump administration’s endless attacks on research funding put that position of preeminence at risk. 🧵
Todd Blanche tried to give cop-beaters and insurrectionists a payout with YOUR tax dollars.
I just voted no on Todd Blanche's nomination to serve as Attorney General.
Before I did, I laid out the 5 biggest reasons why he should not be our nation's top law enforcement officer: youtu.be/vI6xF0HFI4Y?...
Two Republican Senators appeared to be holdouts on Todd Blanche's nomination ... until now.
Here’s why the so-called "deal" they struck is no deal at all:
youtu.be/wC-23PQ1TWg
This should not be a partisan issue. We cannot let the administration push their deregulatory agenda until there’s no wildlife left to protect.
By repealing a key provision that has — for decades — protected endangered wildlife, the Trump administration has made it legal for for-profit industries to destroy the habitats of endangered species.
No such assistance has been forthcoming. The Judiciary Committee and its members should not settle for less than the Acting Attorney General following through on his promise of helping to write this into statute.
Todd Blanche says he stands by his testimony from before our committee last month. Under oath, he pledged to provide Congress with assistance on a bill to make the death of Donald Trump's slush fund enforceable by law.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History884 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
884 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
| 2026-07-28 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-07-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2026-07-23 | S.J. Res. 180 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-44) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-36) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2026-07-21 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-48) |
| 2026-07-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (43-40) |
| 2026-07-16 | S.J. Res. 198 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-50) |
| 2026-07-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-14 | S. 4784 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2026-07-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (46-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 185 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 196 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-23 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2026-06-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-30) |
| 2026-06-22 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (85-5) |
| 2026-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-39) |
| 2026-06-18 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-17 | S. Res. 616 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-39) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 18Next →