Today's ruling is yet another loss for the Trump administration's extreme agenda and its efforts to rewrite the Constitution to give it even more power over American life.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|California
Adam B. Schiff
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes31%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Adam B. Schiff
U.S. SenatorDemocratCalifornia
SoupScore
Adam B.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 95 sponsored · 360 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Birthright citizenship has never been up for debate. The Constitution is clear that anyone born in the United States is an American citizen.
Striking that down was a bridge too far for even this partisan Supreme Court.
Golden arches. Gilded ballrooms. Golf course renovations.
The American people's top priorities, surely.
www.wsj.com/us-news/trum...
While you're tapping into your savings to make ends meet, the Trump family is once again tapping into government deals to line their pockets with mega millions.
www.nytimes.com/2026/06/28/w...
We must fight it at every turn.
Let’s be clear: this case was a brazen attempt by the Republican Party to undermine voters and make it harder for your voice to be heard. Their undemocratic playbook shows no signs of letting up.
And Trump's “deal” hasn't made our world safer, nor has it brought a lasting peace.
Today marks four months since Donald Trump plunged us into his war with Iran.
Servicemembers have lost their lives, civilians have been killed, and this war has cost the American people billions in tax dollars and higher gas prices.
These community project investments are already going to work to help California families, and it’s a privilege to see their positive impact in communities up and down the Golden state.
I’m very proud to have secured nearly $259 million in federal dollars for California projects for fiscal year 2026 that will help expand fire safety, build affordable housing, and create economic opportunity across the Golden State.
This Gun Violence Awareness Month, I’m grateful to have partners in our fight for common sense gun reforms like Californians from @momsdemandaction.org.
He is demanding state ownership of companies.
Has a corrupt politburo of cronies and enablers that are getting rich.
He does have a penchant for military parades and banners with his face.
And he’s ripping off the people.
He’s well on his way.
Happy Equality Day, California!
On the 11th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges decision, we honor those who fought to affirm the fundamental right that Americans should be able to marry who they love.
We must continue the fight to protect the freedoms of LGBTQ+ Americans.
That’s why I’m fighting alongside @padilla.senate.gov, @peters.senate.gov to get USPS to abandon their plans to collect voter lists for good.
www.politico.com/news/2026/06...
A federal court just blocked President Trump’s unconstitutional order to restrict Americans’ right to vote by mail.
Today’s ruling is a win for voters across America, but this struggle is not over.
Or to build back after natural disasters at home, but for his war with Iran.
Count me out.
The price tag of Trump's war with Iran has already cost the American people so much, in high gas prices and lives lost.
Now he's asking for almost $70 billion more.
Not to help you in the struggle to afford health care and groceries.
Our nation has been shaped for the better by the expansive contributions of immigrants.
These flawed decisions will directly harm communities across California and the country.
www.nytimes.com/2026/06/25/u...
Today's decisions will jeopardize the safety of immigrants who have been living and working in the United States lawfully, put millions at risk of mass deportations to dangerous and unstable countries, and result in more kids being separated from their parents.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18