While we've made great strides towards ending the substance use epidemic, too many veterans are still losing their lives due to overdoses.
I’m proud to introduce a new, bipartisan bill to help veterans and their caregivers more easily access overdose reversal agents at no cost.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
In just the past week, President Trump has threatened our allies, from Canada to South Korea, with reckless tariffs.
The President’s on-a-whim strategy isn’t just hurting our allies; it’s directly impacting Granite Staters, who are struggling to afford everyday essentials.
When family emergencies strike, workers need flexibility to respond. 32 years ago, the Family and Medical Leave Act was signed into law to do just that.
Our work isn’t over. I’ll keep fighting so workers don’t have to compromise a paycheck to take care of unexpected emergencies.
Securing reliable, domestic supplies of critical minerals will create jobs and strengthen our economic and national security. I'm leading the bipartisan SECURE Minerals Act to help power the industries of the future.
Learn more below⬇️
ICYMI: With pregnant women and new moms across the country facing an escalating and deeply worrying mental health crisis, @baldwin.senate.gov and I introduced a bill to increase access to mental health and substance use disorder services so that women—and their families—can thrive.
Granite Staters deserve answers about what the federal government is planning in New Hampshire.
My full statement on new findings from the ACLU of New Hampshire confirming plans for an ICE facility in Merrimack:
www.shaheen.senate.gov/news/press/s...
The President is dead wrong when he calls my constituents' affordability concerns a "hoax".
In the Granite State alone, housing costs are up $570 for families since Donald Trump stepped into the White House.
www.jec.senate.gov/public/index...
Today is the anniversary of the ratification of the 15th Amendment, which cemented the right to vote for African American men.
At a time when hard-won civil rights are under pressure, we must uphold the core pillar of American democracy: Free and fair elections.
It's always great to be in the North Country.
Recently, I visited Cranmore Mountain to discuss snow monitoring legislation, heard from leaders in Berlin about rural health care challenges and even got to see some ski jumping at the historic "Big Nansen."
www.conwaydailysun.com/news/local/s...
Rising housing costs. Tariffs pushing up prices. Families facing spiking health care premiums.
But rather than working to ease the economic burden felt by many, the President is focused on enriching himself – to the tune of $10 billion.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/30/u...
It's been over a month since the ACA's enhanced premium tax credits expired, and we're already seeing the effects – spiking premiums and millions opting out of coverage.
It’s time for Republicans to join us to ensure Americans have access to affordable, reliable health care.
New Hampshire: Please stay vigilant this tax season and stay aware of scammers.
The IRS and state tax offices will never reach out by text, email or social media to get your personal information. Click below for more information⬇️
consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-ale...
February is Black History Month, where we honor the contributions African Americans have made to the fabric of our nation’s history and culture.
It’s important to recognize the great strides we’ve made as a nation and also acknowledge the work ahead.
On this day 86 years ago, the first Social Security check was issued to Miss Ida May Fuller.
I remain committed to ensuring that all those who have worked their entire lives receive the entitlement they deserve in retirement.
Tonight I voted to advance five bipartisan bills that will allow us to fund 96% of our government. It also begins a two-week clock on urgent, bipartisan talks, to ensure accountability for what happened in Minnesota and to put in place concrete reforms at DHS. My full statement:
President Trump just said that he wants housing prices to stay high, at a time when so many people are already struggling to keep a roof over their heads. He couldn't be more wrong or out of touch.
It’s the American consumer who bears the brunt of President Trump’s reckless tariffs.
With families already struggling to afford basic goods, they’re paying for 96% of the cost of the administration’s wide-ranging tariffs.
thehill.com/business/569...
While the President can talk himself into thinking prices aren't rising or that affordability is a "hoax," that's not the reality for everyday Americans, many of whom are feeling the pinch.
China dominates critical minerals markets. Securing reliable, domestic supplies will strengthen our economic and national security.
I’m leading the SECURE Minerals Act to ensure we have the tools needed to power key industries without relying on China.
www.axios.com/2026/01/15/c...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-41) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.