Jeanne Shaheen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Hampshire
Born
January 28, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-2841
Office
506 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire

Jeanne Shaheen

Cynthia Jeanne Shaheen is an American politician and former educator serving since 2009 as the senior United States senator from New Hampshire. A member of the Democratic Party, she served from 1997 to 2003 as the 78th governor of New Hampshire. Shaheen is the first woman elected both governor and a U.S. senator, and was the first female governor of New Hampshire.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 782
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jeanne Shaheen headshot
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 283 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

At a time when tariffs and rising prices are squeezing New Hampshire small businesses, it’s especially important to recognize the extraordinary contributions small business owners and entrepreneurs make. It was a pleasure to celebrate their achievements today in Manchester.
House Republicans' budget proposal? Boot 13.7 million Americans from their health insurance to make life easier for billionaires. It's outrageous – and it's imperative that we reject this "plan" in a bipartisan way.
During #NationalWomensHealthWeek, we have to push back against the Trump Administration's attacks on women's health care. We should be lowering barriers to care, not raising them. No matter what, I'm committed to improving access and lowering the cost of women's health care.
65 years ago, in a milestone medical breakthrough, the FDA approved the first birth-control pill. We should be working to support the next milestone breakthrough. Instead, this administration is dismantling our research institutions and restricting access to reproductive care.
I think we can all get behind making the federal government work better, but when we do it in a way that allows millions of tons of food and medicine to rot because we’ve cut funding that ensures it gets to the people who need it, that is not efficient and effective.
Cutting 80,000 workers from the VA, threatening the future of Social Security offices and taking a chainsaw to efforts that bolster the U.S.'s global standing isn't efficient—it's destructive, and it's working Americans who will lose access to the programs they rely on.
Proud to introduce the Defense Workforce Integration Act with bipartisan support in both the Senate and House. As our defense workforce faces recruitment and retention challenges for vital roles, we should be doing all we can to fill vacancies that bolster our national security.
US senator's bill eases path to defense jobs for military recruits with medical issues reut.rs/4iU4PpT
New data from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office confirms what we feared: If Congressional Republicans get their way and gut Medicaid, millions of Americans—including children and seniors—will lose their health insurance entirely. Time to scrap this misguided proposal.
CBO: Millions could lose coverage if GOP pulls back on Medicaid expansion
#JewishAmericanHeritageMonth is an opportunity to celebrate the contributions of the vibrant Jewish American communities in New Hampshire and across the nation. We must also reaffirm our commitment to rooting out hatred and bigotry—antisemitism has no place in America.
Small businesses are the lifeblood of the Granite State’s economy, but it’s getting more costly and difficult for local entrepreneurs to open up shop. Our commonsense legislation would give entrepreneurs a helping hand up so they can succeed and fuel job growth.
Upfront costs are one of the biggest barriers to starting a new business. This National Small Business Week, I’m introducing commonsense legislation to increase the startup tax deduction and help Nevada’s entrepreneurs pursue their dream of starting a business.
Congressional Republicans are looking for $880 billion in federal funding to cut so that they can slash taxes for the wealthiest. Their #1 target: Medicaid. Targeting the health care children, disabled folks and those in long-term care depend on, is cruel and out of touch.
On the campaign trail, President Trump said he was going to lower prices on housing, food, energy and more. He's done none of that in his first 100 days. What he's done is embark on a tariff war that is having significant impacts on businesses across New Hampshire.
It’s National Nurses Day, and I want to thank all the nurses in New Hampshire and across the U.S. for the compassionate, life-saving care they provide. We can always do more to support nurses. I’ll keep working to increase access to training programs that address care shortages.
Happy #TeacherAppreciationWeek to all the educators in the Granite State and beyond! As a former teacher, I couldn’t be more appreciative of the hard work teachers put in every day to provide the best education possible for their students.
In light of recent reports that Elon Musk used his White House role to advance his own personal business interests abroad, President Trump must immediately open an investigation into this flagrant corruption. www.nbcnews.com/tech/elon-mu...
May is Mental Health Awareness Month, and a reminder that we need more federal resources, not less, to make care more accessible. Trump must release the more than $80 million that New Hampshire relies on from Health and Human Services to address public health crises, including mental health care.
Trump's Tariff Taxes are hurting American businesses—including businesses essential to our national security. I recently visited New Hampshire Ball Bearings to learn more about how their business is being disrupted.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
782 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-26S. 1383 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Rejected (53-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-25S.J. Res. 103 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (48-50)
2026-03-25H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-25S.J. Res. 107 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-24S.J. Res. 116 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 116YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-24S. 1383 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24S. 1383 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (53-47)
2026-03-24Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2026-03-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-47)
2026-03-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2026-03-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2026-03-22End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-37)
2026-03-21S. 1383 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Rejected (41-49, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-21S. 1383 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Rejected (49-41, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-20H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Rejected (47-37, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-18S.J. Res. 118 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 118YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-17S. 1383 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-48)
2026-03-17Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-03-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2026-03-12H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Rejected (51-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-12H.R. 6644 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (89-10)
2026-03-11H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (82-11, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-11H.R. 6644 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (84-10)
2026-03-10H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (89-9, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-10Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (71-29)
2026-03-09End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (68-28)
2026-03-05H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-03-04S.J. Res. 104 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 104YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-53)
2026-03-04H.R. 6644 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2026-03-02H.R. 6644 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (84-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (57-33)
2026-02-26End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-34)
2026-02-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-45)
2026-02-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2026-02-24H.R. 7147 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-12H.R. 7147 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2026-02-12H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (49-47)
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2026-02-10S.J. Res. 95 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-51)
2026-02-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2026-02-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2026-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-46)
2026-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-47)
2026-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-04Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (58-39)
2026-02-03End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-39)
2026-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 2 / 16Next →