Jeanne Shaheen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Hampshire
Born
January 28, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-2841
Office
506 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire

Jeanne Shaheen

Cynthia Jeanne Shaheen is an American politician and former educator serving since 2009 as the senior United States senator from New Hampshire. A member of the Democratic Party, she served from 1997 to 2003 as the 78th governor of New Hampshire. Shaheen is the first woman elected both governor and a U.S. senator, and was the first female governor of New Hampshire.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 776
Yes41%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jeanne Shaheen headshot
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Happy Earth Day New Hampshire! We have a duty to protect the world around us, and this morning I joined Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests volunteers at Mt. Major to help with their effort to clean up public trails at the mountain.
Amid Donald Trump and Elon Musk attacking the foundations of Social Security, I stopped by Littleton's Social Security office yesterday. Folks need to know that we're going to do everything we can to keep offices like Littleton's operating for those who rely on their services.
I was appreciative of the chance to speak with Granite Staters at Northern Human Services to hear about their experiences and what the impact would be if Trump and Congressional Republicans slash Medicaid. The message is clear: Folks in the most rural parts of our state will bear the brunt.
The uncertainty created by Trump’s off and on again tariffs are making it impossible for businesses to plan for the future. From steel to chocolate, Granite State businesses are facing rising costs that will ultimately be passed on to consumers. www.nhpr.org/nh-news/2025...
It's beyond belief that anyone in Secretary Hegseth’s position would think that sharing sensitive operational details in an unsecured messaging app, and with family members, is remotely acceptable. My full statement ⬇️ shaheen.senate.gov/shaheen-stat...
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared detailed information about strikes in Yemen to a second unclassified Signal group chat that included his wife and brother, people familiar with the matter said. nyti.ms/4jBQ1wV
Pete Hegseth is pictured wearing a blue suit, looking to his left. A headline reads: "Pete Hegseth Said to Have Shared Sensitive Attack Details in Second Signal Chat." Photo by Eric Lee/The New York Times
Trump claims he wants to revitalize American businesses, but his tariff taxes are having the opposite effect. He's raising prices on working Americans and making it more difficult for small businesses to stay afloat. www.wmur.com/article/tari...
Helping Americans afford the treatments they need to battle cancer isn't wasteful government spending. If Trump and Congressional Republicans cut Medicaid, too many Granite Staters will be unable to afford life-saving health care. www.bostonglobe.com/2025/03/28/m...
America has a sacred bargain with our veterans: they served our nation, and we honor and care for them after their service. The Trump administration's firing of thousands of Veterans Affairs employees compromises our promise to America’s veterans. www.wmur.com/article/trum...
Today, I joined advocates and educators at the Building Safe Communities conference at Plymouth State University. It's a stark reality that 1 in 3 women will experience domestic violence in their lifetime, and I'll continue working to ensure survivors have the resources and support they need.
I'm pleased to see the Senate unanimously passed my bipartisan resolution with Senator Grassley recognizing April as Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. I'll continue working to spread awareness and provide survivors with the resources and support they need to heal.
While Trump cuts public health programs and research funding, #BlackMaternalHealthWeek is a stark reminder that Black moms remain 3x more likely than white moms to die from pregnancy complications. We should be confronting this reality, not gutting the organizations that do so.
Two major tax policies are set to expire this year.   One makes health care accessible for millions of everyday Americans and lowers the cost of life saving care. The other gives a tax break to billionaires.    Guess which one Donald Trump is fighting to save.
Let's be clear: Trump's tariffs are still in effect, and he doesn't care if they cause a recession that would risk millions of Americans losing their jobs. That might not mean much for Trump and his billionaire friends, but for working families, a recession would be devastating.
President Donald Trump was aware the economy could enter a recession, but wanted to avoid a depression, from his tariffs, according to a Wall Street Journal report.
The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit is a proven and effective tool for bringing quality, affordable child care within reach for more families. It’s long past time we expand this tax credit—it’s the right thing to do for workers, families and our nation’s economy.
The Trump administration’s decision to fire needed immigration judges is jeopardizing the U.S. immigration courts’ ability to address a huge backlog of cases. I joined my colleagues in demanding answers from the U.S. Department of Justice.
The American people want a streamlined, humane immigration system. Gutting immigration courts and firing immigration judges only makes matters worse.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
776 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (51-49)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-49)
2025-02-20End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-02-18S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-02-18Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-18Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45)
2025-02-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2025-02-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (72-28)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 16Next →