PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Jeanne Shaheen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Hampshire
Born
January 28, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-2841
Office
506 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire

Jeanne Shaheen

Cynthia Jeanne Shaheen is an American politician and former educator serving since 2009 as the senior United States senator from New Hampshire. A member of the Democratic Party, she served from 1997 to 2003 as the 78th governor of New Hampshire. Shaheen is the first woman elected both governor and a U.S. senator, and was the first female governor of New Hampshire.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 776
Yes41%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenatorShaheenFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Jeanne Shaheen headshot
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 22(source)
Happy Earth Day New Hampshire! We have a duty to protect the world around us, and this morning I joined Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests volunteers at Mt. Major to help with their effort to clean up public trails at the mountain.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 22(source)
Amid Donald Trump and Elon Musk attacking the foundations of Social Security, I stopped by Littleton's Social Security office yesterday. Folks need to know that we're going to do everything we can to keep offices like Littleton's operating for those who rely on their services.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 21(source)
I was appreciative of the chance to speak with Granite Staters at Northern Human Services to hear about their experiences and what the impact would be if Trump and Congressional Republicans slash Medicaid. The message is clear: Folks in the most rural parts of our state will bear the brunt.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 21(source)
The uncertainty created by Trump’s off and on again tariffs are making it impossible for businesses to plan for the future. From steel to chocolate, Granite State businesses are facing rising costs that will ultimately be passed on to consumers. www.nhpr.org/nh-news/2025...
From stuffed animals to steel: How Trump’s tariffs are weighing on NH businesses
A toy importer is delaying a new warehouse in Keene, while a steel fabricator in Greenfield worries other projects could dry up if Trump’s tariffs stifle economic growth.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 21(source)
It's beyond belief that anyone in Secretary Hegseth’s position would think that sharing sensitive operational details in an unsecured messaging app, and with family members, is remotely acceptable. My full statement ⬇️ shaheen.senate.gov/shaheen-stat...
The New York Times
@nytimes.com
Open post ↗
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared detailed information about strikes in Yemen to a second unclassified Signal group chat that included his wife and brother, people familiar with the matter said. nyti.ms/4jBQ1wV
Pete Hegseth is pictured wearing a blue suit, looking to his left. A headline reads: "Pete Hegseth Said to Have Shared Sensitive Attack Details in Second Signal Chat." Photo by Eric Lee/The New York Times
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 17(source)
Trump claims he wants to revitalize American businesses, but his tariff taxes are having the opposite effect. He's raising prices on working Americans and making it more difficult for small businesses to stay afloat. www.wmur.com/article/tari...
Impact of tariffs tough to avoid for some New Hampshire small businesses
Some New Hampshire business owners say they're trying to plan ahead and budget for tariffs, but it's particularly difficult for those dealing with perishable goods.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 16(source)
Helping Americans afford the treatments they need to battle cancer isn't wasteful government spending. If Trump and Congressional Republicans cut Medicaid, too many Granite Staters will be unable to afford life-saving health care. www.bostonglobe.com/2025/03/28/m...
In N.H., possible Medicaid cuts could put people battling cancer at risk - The Boston Globe
Researchers say rolling back Medicaid eligibility could undermine preventive care and unwind the program’s progress in the Granite State.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 15(source)
America has a sacred bargain with our veterans: they served our nation, and we honor and care for them after their service. The Trump administration's firing of thousands of Veterans Affairs employees compromises our promise to America’s veterans. www.wmur.com/article/trum...
Senators criticize Trump administration for potential cuts to VA staff
The Trump administration says it's looking for ways to make the government more efficient, but New Hampshire's U.S. senators said Monday that shouldn't come at the expense of veterans.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 11(source)
Today, I joined advocates and educators at the Building Safe Communities conference at Plymouth State University. It's a stark reality that 1 in 3 women will experience domestic violence in their lifetime, and I'll continue working to ensure survivors have the resources and support they need.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 11(source)
I'm pleased to see the Senate unanimously passed my bipartisan resolution with Senator Grassley recognizing April as Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. I'll continue working to spread awareness and provide survivors with the resources and support they need to heal.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 11(source)
While Trump cuts public health programs and research funding, #BlackMaternalHealthWeek is a stark reminder that Black moms remain 3x more likely than white moms to die from pregnancy complications. We should be confronting this reality, not gutting the organizations that do so.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 10(source)
Two major tax policies are set to expire this year.   One makes health care accessible for millions of everyday Americans and lowers the cost of life saving care. The other gives a tax break to billionaires.    Guess which one Donald Trump is fighting to save.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 10(source)
Let's be clear: Trump's tariffs are still in effect, and he doesn't care if they cause a recession that would risk millions of Americans losing their jobs. That might not mean much for Trump and his billionaire friends, but for working families, a recession would be devastating.
CNBC
@cnbc.com
Open post ↗
President Donald Trump was aware the economy could enter a recession, but wanted to avoid a depression, from his tariffs, according to a Wall Street Journal report.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 10(source)
The Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit is a proven and effective tool for bringing quality, affordable child care within reach for more families. It’s long past time we expand this tax credit—it’s the right thing to do for workers, families and our nation’s economy.
U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen@shaheen.senate.govApr 10(source)
The Trump administration’s decision to fire needed immigration judges is jeopardizing the U.S. immigration courts’ ability to address a huge backlog of cases. I joined my colleagues in demanding answers from the U.S. Department of Justice.
Senator Dick Durbin
@durbin.senate.gov
Open post ↗
The American people want a streamlined, humane immigration system. Gutting immigration courts and firing immigration judges only makes matters worse.
Unknown
@unknown
Open post ↗
← Newer postsPosts page 37Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
776 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-18—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-09-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-09-17—Decision of the Chair PN12-19 and PN25-28 and PN12-45 and PN22-1 and PN22-2 and PN22-5 and PN22-27 and PN22-20 and PN22-21 and PN26-8 and PN26-34 and PN26-35 and PN55-41 and PN22-4 and PN22-8 and PN22-19 and PN26-1 and PN22-23 and PN25-40 and PN26-7 and PN26-19 and PN26-31 and PN60-3 and PN26-44 and PN25-2 and PN55-16 and PN60-9 and PN60-10 and PN129-8 and PN26-45 and PN141-37 and PN141-7 and PN141-28 and PN12-22 and PN25-21 and PN22-3 and PN26-22 and PN13-5 and PN22-24 and PN25-33 and PN141-18 and PN150-5 and PN345-16 and PN55-42 and PN54-6 and PN54-7 and PN55-45 and PN55-25YESYES✓Decision of Chair Not Sustained (47-52)
2025-09-17—Motion to Reconsider PN55-25 and PN55-45 and PN54-7 and PN54-6 and PN55-42 and PN345-16 and PN150-5 and PN141-18 and PN25-33 and PN22-24 and PN13-5 and PN26-22 and PN22-3 and PN25-21 and PN12-22 and PN141-28 and PN141-7 and PN141-37 and PN26-45 and PN129-8 and PN60-10 and PN60-9 and PN55-16 and PN25-2 and PN26-44 and PN60-3 and PN26-31 and PN26-19 and PN26-7 and PN25-40 and PN22-23 and PN26-1 and PN22-19 and PN22-8 and PN22-4 and PN55-41 and PN26-35 and PN26-34 and PN26-8 and PN22-21 and PN22-20 and PN22-27 and PN22-5 and PN22-2 and PN22-1 and PN12-45 and PN12-19 and PN25-28NONO✓Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (51-47)
2025-09-17—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-16S. Con. Res. 22 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (36-62)
2025-09-16S.J. Res. 60 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51)
2025-09-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-47)
2025-09-15—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2025-09-15S. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Resolution Agreed to (51-44)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)Decision of the Chair S.Res. 377YESYES✓Decision of Chair Not Sustained (45-53)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)Motion to Reconsider S.Res. 377NONO✓Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (52-45)
2025-09-11S. Res. 377 (119th)End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-10S. 2296 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-49)
2025-09-09S. Res. 377 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-09S. Res. 377 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-09-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-09-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-09-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-09-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-09-08—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-43)
2025-09-04S. 2296 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (83-13)
2025-09-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-02S. 2296 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (71-23)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYES——Nomination Confirmed (72-22)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (59-35)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (52-42)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (78-17)
2025-08-02—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-19)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-45)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (49-44)
2025-08-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-08-02—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-41)
2025-08-01—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-01—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-08-01—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (81-15)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (21-75)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (15-81)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 16Next →