Jeanne Shaheen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Hampshire
Born
January 28, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-2841
Office
506 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire

Jeanne Shaheen

Cynthia Jeanne Shaheen is an American politician and former educator serving since 2009 as the senior United States senator from New Hampshire. A member of the Democratic Party, she served from 1997 to 2003 as the 78th governor of New Hampshire. Shaheen is the first woman elected both governor and a U.S. senator, and was the first female governor of New Hampshire.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 776
Yes41%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jeanne Shaheen headshot
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Today marks 1 year since the first national PFAS drinking water standards were established. Too many Granite State families and communities have been impacted by PFAS contamination. I’ll keep working to support research and clean up efforts while holding polluters accountable.
While Republicans are working to pass tax breaks for billionaires, Democrats are working to pass tax cuts for families and workers. Our legislation would expand the transformational Child Tax Credit for families and the Earned Income Tax Credit for workers.
In the richest country in the world, child poverty is a moral obscenity. The expanded #ChildTaxCredit would change the lives of millions of American children for the better. Today, Democrats demonstrated that we are fighting for families in every corner of our country.
I'm introducing legislation to prohibit Special Government Employees like Elon Musk from raking in federal dollars in government contracts at the expense of taxpayers. Those who step up to serve the public should not stand to benefit in private. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Trump’s short-sighted tariffs are a tax hike on American families—jacking up the price of gas, groceries, electronics, cars and everything in between. I joined my colleagues in introducing a resolution to force the administration to reverse course before it does irreparable harm.
The Trump Administration's decision to indiscriminately fire staff at the Office of Head Start and the Office of Child Care will harm child care assistance programs’ ability to serve working families. We're pushing back.
In the middle of Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month, firings at the CDC by the Trump administration could jeopardize critical efforts to prevent sexual violence. Leaving educators at rape crisis centers in NH and across the U.S. in the dark does nothing to make our communities safer.
I was pleased to join folks in Manchester who are willing to speak out about the harm that will come if President Trump fires thousands of Veterans Affairs employees.      Crippling the Department won't make services better, it’ll make it harder for veterans to access the care they deserve.
For every $1 white, non-Hispanic men earn, Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander women earn 83¢. On #AANHPIEqualPay Day, we recommit to closing the wage gap so that we can achieve a society where everyone can thrive.
Trump promised to lower energy prices for Americans. Instead, his energy secretary is creating a clean energy “hit list.” Fact: Investing in clean energy sources is the best way to increase supply and bring costs down.
Trump’s tariff tax hike is a disaster for working class Granite Staters and will leave less money in your pocket. We just tried to pass an amendment to the Republican budget resolution that would end Trump's inflationary tariffs. Senate Republicans blocked it.
Donald Trump is directing Senate Republicans to force through a budget resolution that paves the way for a billionaire tax break on the backs of working Americans. They're targeting school lunch, Medicaid, SNAP and more, all to benefit their rich friends.
New Hampshire's "trigger law" means that the Granite Advantage Program could be eliminated if there are drastic cuts to federal Medicaid funding. The Republican budget resolution paves the way for Medicaid cuts that could leave 60,000 Granite Staters without health insurance.
Proud to help introduce a bipartisan resolution recognizing National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month and the tireless work by advocates, public safety, law enforcement and health professionals to prevent sexual violence and ensure survivors have what they need to heal.
Unfreezing millions of dollars to address the substance use and mental health crises would be great news if New Hampshire had joined the lawsuit. As long as these funds are frozen, Granite Staters' health and well-being will be at risk. The State needs to step up. www.nytimes.com/2025/04/03/u...
On this day 57 years ago, we lost Martin Luther King Jr. to a senseless act of violence and injustice. His leadership, message of peace and faith in citizen engagement lives on and drives our efforts to achieve his vision of full equality under the law.
For most Granite Staters, cars are essential – bringing them to work, school and everywhere in between. But President Trump "couldn't care less" that his tariffs on automobiles will make buying or repairing a car more expensive and will cause more hardship in our state.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
776 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 55NONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONOPoint of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55YESYESMotion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)YESYESMotion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-05-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-40)
2025-05-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-05-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-05-13End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-05-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-05-08S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-49, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-08H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 60NONOJoint Resolution Passed (50-43)
2025-05-08S.J. Res. 7 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 7NOT_VOTINGNOJoint Resolution Passed (50-38)
2025-05-07S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 13NONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-05-06H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47)
2025-05-06S.J. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47)
2025-05-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-05-06S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-06H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 61NONOJoint Resolution Passed (55-45)
2025-05-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43)
2025-05-01End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-05-01S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 31NONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-46)
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 75NONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-45)
2025-04-30S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 16Next →