At a Glance

Seat

U.S. Senator from Michigan

Born

July 10, 1976

Age 49

Phone

(202) 224-4822

Office

291 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Michigan

Elissa Slotkin

Elissa Blair Slotkin is an American politician and former intelligence analyst serving since 2025 as the junior United States senator from Michigan. A member of the Democratic Party, she served in the United States House of Representatives from 2019 to 2025.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 788

Yes34%

No63%

Present0%

Not Voting3%

Party align92%

Cross-party8%

SoupScore

District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @RepSlotkin Facebook Instagram

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Elissa Slotkin

U.S. SenatorDemocratMichigan

SoupScore

Elissa's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 20 sponsored · 113 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted bySenator Elissa Slotkin

KFF@kff.orgSep 30(source)

How much more would the average ACA Marketplace enrollee pay in out-of-pocket premiums in 2026 without the enhanced premium tax credits? 114% on average, or *more than double* what they pay now. Our new analysis explains why: https://on.kff.org/3WfWxjj

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

Have questions about how a shutdown will impact you? Visit: slotkin.senate.gov/shutdown

Government Shutdown FAQ - Senator Elissa Slotkin

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

Yesterday, I met with Prime Minister Albin Kurti during his visit to the U.S. We discussed the importance of the U.S.-Kosovo relationship and the deep ties with the Michigan diaspora community, who are vital members of our community.

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

I had the distinct pleasure of meeting the legendary @janegoodallcan.bsky.social during one of her last visits to D.C. She will forever be known as a conservationist, educator, and pioneer in her field. May she rest in peace.

Reposted bySenator Elissa Slotkin

Michigan Advance@michiganadvance.comOct 1(source)

After Congress missed its deadline to fund the federal government by the start of October, local impacts on Michiganders are already starting to be felt, according to three University of Michigan faculty members. Story from @kdailey.bsky.social

University of Michigan faculty weigh in on the local effects of federal shutdown • Michigan Advance

Reposted bySenator Elissa Slotkin

Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock@warnock.senate.govOct 1(source)

I was sent this by a Georgian this morning. 2025 premiums vs 2026 premiums for someone making $65k a year. Republicans in Washington did this. This is what I'm fighting to stop. This is what’s at stake in this shutdown fight.

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

All this makes us less safe in the process. If you care about the military — not to mention democracy — you should mark yesterday in your calendars as a sad and historic moment in our history. (10/10)

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

President Trump and Secretary Hegseth are attempting to manipulate it for their own gain, tarnishing the military’s reputation and making American citizens suspicious and fearful of their own protectors. (9/10)

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

The military is the most trusted institution in the country. It's the most lethal fighting force the world has ever known, and a cornerstone of American power. (8/10)

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

One day, historians will study this moment in history, and the scene that took place yesterday. What’s unclear is what the final story will look like. (7/10)

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

Instead, he's using a well-worn playbook that seeks to consolidate the use of force and improperly turn the military into the enforcers of his political agenda. It should make all of us deeply uncomfortable, because while it’s someone else’s city today, it could be your city tomorrow. (6/10)

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

... in the case of DC, re-hire the National Park Service workers who used to pick up trash in federal parks. (5/10)

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

Make no mistake, this is NOT about fighting crime. If he truly cared about the safety of these cities, he could use his broad authority to provide police forces in those cities, hire hundreds of new officers, or... (4/10)

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

On top of LA and DC, the commander in chief laid out his goal of using our cities as military "training grounds" and called on American generals to fight "the war from within." (3/10)

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

First, and most importantly: they accelerated their case that America is in the middle of a violent insurrection that the military must quell. The President believes he is the hero of his own story and is willing to hurt the standing of the U.S. military to look tough in public. (2/10)

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govOct 1(source)

Yesterday’s military spectacle from Secretary Hegseth and President Trump should be seen for what it is: a critical moment in our history and our story as Americans. (1/10)

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govSep 30(source)

Since July, I have been very clear: any conversation about my vote needs to start with health care. My statement ahead of the government funding deadline.

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govSep 30(source)

The targeted violence in Grand Blanc was meant to terrorize. And by making us afraid, it is infringing on our freedom. If people don’t feel they are safe in their sanctuaries, that is infringing on their freedom.

Senator Elissa Slotkin@slotkin.senate.govSep 30(source)

Our first responders in Grand Blanc ran toward the danger. They are heroes.

Reposted bySenator Elissa Slotkin

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialSep 30(source)

The White House keeps saying this is about health care for immigrants. That’s an OUTRIGHT LIE and a blatant attempt to distract you from the fact that they’re trying to increase ALL our premiums – no matter what insurance you have.

← Newer postsPosts page 51Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(20)

S. 4188 (119th)
A bill to prohibit a covered individual from engaging in covered transactions involving pred…
S. 4113 (119th)
A bill to provide for limitations on the use of artificial intelligence by Department of Def…
S. 3819 (119th)
A bill to amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to include certain yellow colorin…
S. 3766 (119th)
A bill to prohibit the use of funds available to Representatives and Senators with respect t…
S. 3600 (119th)
A bill to require the President to declare a national housing emergency and invoke the Defen…

Cosponsored Bills(113)

S. Res. 735 (119th)
A resolution designating the week of May 10 through May 16, 2026, as "National Police Week".
Joined: 2026-05-14
S. 4487 (119th)
A bill to increase, effective as of December 1, 2026, the rates of compensation for veterans…
Joined: 2026-05-11
S. 4470 (119th)
A bill to amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to improve the Offi…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. Res. 716 (119th)
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding critical elements of the United St…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. 4429 (119th)
A bill to prohibit the importation, manufacture, sale, resale, or introduction into intersta…
Joined: 2026-04-29

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

788 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05	—	Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (5-94)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-03	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03	H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48)
2025-04-03	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-04-03	S.J. Res. 26 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83)
2025-04-03	S.J. Res. 33 (119th)	Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82)
2025-04-03	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-04-03	H.J. Res. 24 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (53-42)
2025-04-02	H.J. Res. 24 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-02	S.J. Res. 37 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (51-48)
2025-04-02	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-04-02	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-01	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-03-31	—	End debate	NOT_VOTING	NO	—	Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2025-03-27	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-03-27	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-03-27	S.J. Res. 18 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (52-48)
2025-03-26	S.J. Res. 18 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-26	H.J. Res. 25 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	NO	✕↔	Joint Resolution Passed (70-28)
2025-03-26	H.J. Res. 25 (119th)	Begin consideration	YES	NO	✕↔	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-26	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-26	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-03-26	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-26	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-26	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-03-25	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-25	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (56-44)
2025-03-25	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44)
2025-03-25	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-03-25	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-03-25	—	Confirm nominee	YES	NO	✕↔	Nomination Confirmed (74-25)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 16Next →