
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 1
Melanie A. Stansbury
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes40%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Melanie A. Stansbury
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 1
SoupScore
Melanie A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 161 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
We love our parks! And, this one is particularly meaningful—built as a memorial for Albuquerque Police Officer Daniel Webster. We were so honored to join other city leaders, officers, family, and students from Hawthorne Elementary this week to cut the ribbon on this beautiful park.
Go parks! 🌲❤️
What Epstein and his associates did wasn’t just a crime—they deliberately built a system designed to exploit the vulnerable using money, influence, & power.
That’s why this is more than just getting justice. This is about changing that system so that horrible things like this never happen again.
Donald Trump says he’ll block every Congressional bill until we pass the SAVE Act—basically saying he wants to hold us hostage unless we disenfranchise millions of voters and their access to the ballot box. So let us be clear.
We are NOT 👏 going 👏 to 👏 pass 👏your 👏 voter suppression bill.
Period.
Every day—whether in NM or DC—we LOVE the work we do for New Mexico! It is truly an honor and a joy to serve you all in Congress, and I am grateful for every conversation, every idea, every act of service, and every hug we get in our office every day! Thank you! 🙏 ❤️
Powerful people around Jeffrey Epstein helped move money, survivors, and the justice system. Lawyers, accountants, and business associates—all enabling Epstein’s crimes.
That’s why the depositions of Richard Kahn and Darren Indyke are so important—because justice demands accountability.
Once again—New Mexico is leading the way by protecting free and fair elections! NM becomes the first state in the nation to ban armed federal agents at the ballot box. This is how you do it! 🗳️🇺🇸💪
We’ve gathered with community and faith leaders across NM-01 to discuss what it means to protect our communities and ensure everyone is safe—especially our immigrant communities.
Grateful to all the faith leaders who show up every day who are working to share their hopes, prayers, and ideas. ❤️
This is HORRIFIC. Pete Hegseth chose to gut offices that prevent accidental civilian deaths.
This is what happens when you put someone entirely unfit in a position of power. It’s time for him to go!
Remember when Trump sued ABC, Meta, X, & Paramount, & they all settled for millions?
That money was supposed to go to Trump’s future presidential library fund—but that has been dissolved with no sign of where the money went.
@warren.senate.gov, @blumenthal.senate.gov, & I are demanding answers!
TWO BREAKING DEVELOPMENTS IN THE EPSTEIN CASE:
Every day, we honor the brave men and women who serve our communities. This week, we cut the ribbon on Officer Daniel Webster Park in Albuquerque, honoring one of APD’s finest who died in 2015. We were honored to hear from APD Deputy Chief Languit about his former partner and the park’s legacy. ❤️
Time to address the elephant in the room: it is time for Pete Hegseth to go. ⬇️
Any and all public officials who have committed an act of sexual harassment or abuse must be held fully accountable to the public. ⬇️
We are delivering for New Mexico—even as times are tough. Funding for new schools, housing, hospitals, behavioral health and addiction recovery services, public safety, and water projects.
Real investments. Real people. And, real generational change.
In NM, we know the sacrifices our service members have made. That’s why they are at the heart of our work.
From funding a brand-new veteran’s transitional housing center to helping pass the largest expansion of veteran’s benefits with the PACT Act since the GI bill—veterans deserve our support.
You better believe we’ll be investigating.
newrepublic.com/post/207555/...
I know so many of you are scared, angry, and downright pissed off about what’s happening with Trump’s war in the Middle East.
So, I want to give a little breakdown on what’s happening, Congress’s authority, and what comes next.
Once again: New Mexico is leading the way!
Yesterday, the NM DOJ began its investigation at Zorro Ranch. Why did the FBI tell NM to drop its case in 2019? Who asked them to do so and why?
That’s why this new investigation is so important. Survivors have waited too long for justice, and NM is leading the way.
Breaking Epstein Investigation Update! NM DOJ has begun searching Zorro Ranch. ⬇️
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.