Melanie A. Stansbury headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New Mexico District 1
Born
January 31, 1979
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-6316
Office
1421 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 1

Melanie A. Stansbury

Melanie Ann Stansbury is an American politician and former ecology instructor serving as the U.S. representative for New Mexico's 1st congressional district since 2021. The district includes the majority of Albuquerque and most of its suburbs. A Democrat, Stansbury previously served as a member of the New Mexico House of Representatives for the 28th district from 2019 to 2021.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes40%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Melanie A. Stansbury headshot
Melanie A. Stansbury
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 1
SoupScore
Melanie A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 161 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

We love our parks! And, this one is particularly meaningful—built as a memorial for Albuquerque Police Officer Daniel Webster. We were so honored to join other city leaders, officers, family, and students from Hawthorne Elementary this week to cut the ribbon on this beautiful park. Go parks! 🌲❤️
What Epstein and his associates did wasn’t just a crime—they deliberately built a system designed to exploit the vulnerable using money, influence, & power. That’s why this is more than just getting justice. This is about changing that system so that horrible things like this never happen again.
Donald Trump says he’ll block every Congressional bill until we pass the SAVE Act—basically saying he wants to hold us hostage unless we disenfranchise millions of voters and their access to the ballot box. So let us be clear. We are NOT 👏 going 👏 to 👏 pass 👏your 👏 voter suppression bill. Period.
Every day—whether in NM or DC—we LOVE the work we do for New Mexico! It is truly an honor and a joy to serve you all in Congress, and I am grateful for every conversation, every idea, every act of service, and every hug we get in our office every day! Thank you! 🙏 ❤️
Powerful people around Jeffrey Epstein helped move money, survivors, and the justice system. Lawyers, accountants, and business associates—all enabling Epstein’s crimes. That’s why the depositions of Richard Kahn and Darren Indyke are so important—because justice demands accountability.
We’ve gathered with community and faith leaders across NM-01 to discuss what it means to protect our communities and ensure everyone is safe—especially our immigrant communities. Grateful to all the faith leaders who show up every day who are working to share their hopes, prayers, and ideas. ❤️
Remember when Trump sued ABC, Meta, X, & Paramount, & they all settled for millions? That money was supposed to go to Trump’s future presidential library fund—but that has been dissolved with no sign of where the money went. @warren.senate.gov, @blumenthal.senate.gov, & I are demanding answers!
Every day, we honor the brave men and women who serve our communities. This week, we cut the ribbon on Officer Daniel Webster Park in Albuquerque, honoring one of APD’s finest who died in 2015. We were honored to hear from APD Deputy Chief Languit about his former partner and the park’s legacy. ❤️
We are delivering for New Mexico—even as times are tough. Funding for new schools, housing, hospitals, behavioral health and addiction recovery services, public safety, and water projects. Real investments. Real people. And, real generational change.
In NM, we know the sacrifices our service members have made. That’s why they are at the heart of our work. From funding a brand-new veteran’s transitional housing center to helping pass the largest expansion of veteran’s benefits with the PACT Act since the GI bill—veterans deserve our support.
Yesterday, the NM DOJ began its investigation at Zorro Ranch. Why did the FBI tell NM to drop its case in 2019? Who asked them to do so and why?  That’s why this new investigation is so important. Survivors have waited too long for justice, and NM is leading the way.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionNOYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNONOPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 10Next →