PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Peter Welch headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Vermont
Born
May 2, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 224-4242
Office
115 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Vermont

Peter Welch

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes30%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align95%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
BlueskyFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Peter Welch headshot
Peter Welch
U.S. SenatorDemocratVermont
SoupScore
Peter's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 81 sponsored · 432 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 14(source)
The Trump Administration is ending the EPA's 17-year-old finding that greenhouse gases threaten public health, making it harder for the government to regulate pollution. It means corporations can cut corners while you pay the price with your health.
Headline graphic from NBC News with a photo of a power plant. Text on the graphic reads: EPA to repeal its own conclusion that greenhouse gases warm the planet and threaten health
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 13(source)
Because of Republicans, ICE now has a larger budget than the CDC. It has a larger budget than OSHA, the FDA, the EPA, and NOAA. We don’t need Republicans to give ICE even more money, we need them to come to the table to make reforms to ICE—which a majority of Americans want.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 12(source)
Congratulations to cross-country skier Jessie Diggins—who trains in Stratton—on winning a bronze medal in the 10k freestyle distance! She builds on her legacy as one of the greatest American cross-country skiers of all time.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 12(source)
Speaker Johnson and House Republican leadership tried to block future votes against President Trump's tariffs. Luckily, Democrats and a few Republicans defeated the measure. We can't allow working families to continue to be crushed under the weight of these tariffs.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 12(source)
Folks who vote for Democrats, folks who vote for Republicans, and folks who don’t vote at all are making it clear ICE has gone too far. The American people want Republicans to work with Democrats to make real reforms to ICE.
Graphic of an NBC news article with a photo of protestors in Minnesota. Text on the graphic reads: Poll: Americans support ICE overhaul amid federal funding fight.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 10(source)
People in this country shouldn’t have to live in fear of those who are supposed to protect them. We need real reforms to ICE. Masks off, body cameras on. Enforce a code of conduct and ensure independent investigations. End mass targeting of communities.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 6(source)
President Trump shared a video that was blatantly racist. I don’t want to hear my Republican colleagues say “they didn’t see it” when asked. It’s disgusting behavior, and every Republican should condemn it.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 5(source)
The last nuclear arms treaty between the U.S. and Russia is expiring. There's now a real possibility of a new nuclear arms race between global superpowers. President Trump must work with Russia and China to forge a new arms control treaty to prevent a nuclear war.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 5(source)
Right now, federal restrictions limit nonprofits from lending students low-interest loans to help them pay for college. That's why I’m introducing a bill with Senator Grassley to lift these restrictions, so more young people get the opportunity to chase their educational goals.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 4(source)
ICE should be targeting the worst criminals. But under Secretary Noem, it’s been turned into a masked secret police force that shoots citizens and teargasses children.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govFeb 2(source)
ICE leadership has informed their agents that they have expanded powers to arrest people without a warrant. It's another attack by President Trump and Secretary Noem on the foundations of our democracy.
Photo of Secretary Kristi Noem. Headline from New York Times reads: ICE expands power of agents to arrest people without warrants.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govJan 29(source)
Trump tried to "find votes" in Georgia when he lost the state in the 2020 election. Now his FBI has raided a Georgia county election office. It's yet another attack on our elections and on our democracy.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govJan 29(source)
Household debt has hit a record high of $18.6 trillion. Credit card delinquency highest since Great Recession. Auto loan delinquency highest since 2010. And yet President Trump is taking money away from working families to spend it on billionaire tax cuts and more money for ICE.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govJan 29(source)
Right now, EMS providers aren't just delivering emergency care to Medicare patients, they're covering the cost too. That's why I'm introducing a bill with @sanders.senate.gov and @balint.house.gov to reimburse those on the frontlines for their life-saving work in Vermont and around the nation.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govJan 29(source)
It's been two years since 5-year-old Hind Rajab and six members of her family were killed by Israeli tank and machine gun fire. Two Red Crescent workers sent to rescue them were also killed. I will continue to fight for justice for her and so many other Palestinians who have died.
Photo of Hind Rajab.
Senator Peter Welch@welch.senate.govJan 28(source)
Data centers are driving electricity bills up across the country for working families already struggling to make ends meet. My colleagues and I are demanding answers on how New England’s grid operator plans to protect families from the costs of new data centers.
Link
← Newer postsPosts page 14Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept House changesNONO✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05—Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (5-94)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48)
2025-04-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-04-03S.J. Res. 26 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26YESNO✕Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83)
2025-04-03S.J. Res. 33 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33YESNO✕Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82)
2025-04-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-04-03H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (53-42)
2025-04-02H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-02S.J. Res. 37 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-48)
2025-04-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-04-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-01—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-03-31—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2025-03-27—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-03-27—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-03-27S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-48)
2025-03-26S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (70-28)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-26—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-03-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-26—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-03-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (56-44)
2025-03-25—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44)
2025-03-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 18Next →