Breaking the pairing tradition for boards and commissions, appointing only Republicans, and firing sitting Democratic appointees.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island
Sheldon Whitehouse
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 831
Yes32%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align95%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sheldon Whitehouse
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Sheldon's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 89 sponsored · 224 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Over-ruling the Parliamentarian to destroy emissions standards to let their Big Oil donors sell more gasoline.
Appointing to a United States Court of Appeals a character involved in three prosecutorial misconduct episodes in six months, and a subject of pending contempt of court proceedings.
Republicans are saying that our opposition to Trump nominees is “unprecedented.” Seriously? Let’s take a look at some of the stuff that is really “unprecedented”:
A partisan rescissions bill pulling back funding that was agreed to by both sides in bipartisan appropriations agreements.
The Beautiful-for-Billionaires Bill “was positive for us across all of our top priorities,” said American Petroleum Institute.
What was ROI on fossil fuel political spending from the giveaways? Bet they made their money back and more.
www.nytimes.com/2025/07/30/c...
Reposted bySenator Sheldon Whitehouse
Today’s report shows a quarter million fewer jobs in May and June than previously asserted by the administration – evidence that Trump’s tariffs are raising costs and slowing the economy. (1/3)
The US economy added only 73,000 jobs last month, less than half the average of last year as the labor market weakens. Estimates of job growth in past two months were also revised downward. Manufacturing jobs fell for the third straight month. www.nytimes.com/2025/08/01/u...
Reposted bySenator Sheldon Whitehouse
Reposted bySenator Sheldon Whitehouse
It is seriously dangerous territory when Trump fires anyone who doesn't cook the books for him.
The entire economy hinges on the accurate, nonpartisan data we get from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Republicans need to join us in fighting to protect the integrity of BLS.
Reposted bySenator Sheldon Whitehouse
Firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because they accurately report on your struggling economy isn't just corrupt, it's deeply irresponsible.
Undermining our economic data is only going to create further chaos and uncertainty for our businesses big and small.
"“It makes us ask if he was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal actions, especially given his statement two years later that his good friend Jeffrey ‘likes women on the younger side … no doubt about it.’”
Reposted bySenator Sheldon Whitehouse
What good is an Environmental Protection Agency without its power to *protect* our public health?
The Trump Administration is putting polluters over our children's future. apnews.com/article/trum...
Reposted bySenator Sheldon Whitehouse
Remember when Trump told Big Oil he'd deliver their wish list if they gave $1B to his campaign?
Well, his billionaire tax giveaway gave them an $18 BILLION windfall — while gutting Medicaid. A corrupt bargain through and through and another betrayal of the American people.
Republicans continue to be obsessed with handing seniors’ money off to private equity sleazeballs.
Meanwhile, I have a plan to fix Social Security and protect seniors’ benefits forever by requiring that the wealthy start paying their full fair share.
Just now, MAGA Bondi brought a complaint against the judge whose contempt hearing was stayed, obviously to “create a conflict” that would prevent him from looking into MAGA DOJ’s misconduct and embarrassing Senate “hear no evil” Republicans.
That contempt proceeding? It was “pending” because two Trump judges on the DC Circuit blocked it for three months, with a procedure usually limited to days, possibly so Bove could get through the Senate before the contempt hearing could produce evidence.
They let MAGA AG Bondi and DAG Blanche sit in the hearing to give committee Republicans the MAGA eyeball. (Remember Frank Pentangeli’s father coming to the Senate hearing in “The Godfather Part II”?)
Over in the Senate, the Judiciary Committee “rollover Republicans” ignored three whistleblowers, two career prosecutors’ resignation letters, and a pending contempt proceeding, to stuff Bove through without honest answers. (Hear no evil.)
A misconduct complaint from the New York Bar was referred to the Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility, which never acted on it. (Bondi had cleared out the career OPR person and put in a MAGA person, so I doubt it got a hard look.)
This was a guy who set the all-time Department of Justice record for prosecutorial misconduct, with three significant episodes in six months (plus whatever cover-up he did of Jeffrey Epstein’s files — he wouldn’t answer). Nothing even comes close.
A disappearing IG complaint about Emil Bove? What, “the dog ate it”? This Emil Bove mess could not smell much worse, until you sniff out the rest of the story.
🧵
(Warning: the decision is over 100 pages long, but still a warm bath of logic, fact and law midst the MAGA lies.)
s3.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History831 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
831 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17