At a Glance

Seat

U.S. Senator from Virginia

Born

December 15, 1954

Age 71

Phone

(202) 224-2023

Office

703 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Virginia

Mark R. Warner

Mark Robert Warner is an American businessman and politician serving as the senior United States senator from Virginia, a seat he has held since 2009. A member of the Democratic Party, Warner served as the 69th governor of Virginia from 2002 to 2006. He is vice chair of the Senate Democratic Caucus and vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 776

Yes34%

No61%

Present0%

Not Voting5%

Party align89%

Cross-party10%

SoupScore

District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @MarkWarner Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Mark R. Warner

U.S. SenatorDemocratVirginia

SoupScore

Mark R.'s ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 165 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 27(source)

Throughout this shutdown, Trump has decided to just continue funding parts of the government he deems worthy. If he wanted to maintain SNAP, he could. But he already signed the largest cut in the program's history in July. Does this sound like someone who cares about SNAP?

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 24(source)

Today’s inflation report shows hiring is down and prices are up. On top of that, health care costs are about to skyrocket. Democrats want to take on affordability, deal with the health care crisis, and get the government open. The GOP refuses to negotiate for the good of the American people.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 23(source)

Their government. Their shutdown.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 23(source)

I’ve long supported nonpartisan redistricting and fair maps, but Donald Trump has spent months trying to rig the system instead of actually tackling rising costs for Americans. It’s no surprise that Democrats in places like Virginia would be thinking through appropriate ways to respond.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 23(source)

Horrible…. A breast cancer survivor from Virginia Beach just got in touch with my office… she’s paying $258/month for her ACA health insurance right now… it’s going to go up to $1,018/month if Republicans keep failing to show up to work!

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 23(source)

If you didn’t show up to work for over a month, you’d probably be fired. In this government, it just means you’re a House Republican still collecting your six-figure salary!

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 23(source)

Trump is tearing down the White House to soothe his ego.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 22(source)

Trump’s said it himself – the President is to blame for a shutdown… but he has shown ZERO interest in negotiating. What is he so afraid of?

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 22(source)

Virginia – new ACA premiums are coming out today, and thousands of Virginia families are going to start paying a whole lot more. Rates significantly higher? I want to hear what you’re experiencing. Get in touch and tell me what your new rates are. www.warner.senate.gov/public/index...

Contact Page

U.S. Senator Mark R. Warner

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 22(source)

I wrote about Trump trying to steal $230 million in taxpayer dollars to line his pockets. READ IT HERE: senatorwarner.substack.com/p/trump-trie...

Trump tries to steal $230 million from taxpayers

On that DOJ story

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 22(source)

Irony is dead.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 22(source)

Day 22 of the shutdown. Another day when Trump is too chicken to even attempt to negotiate with Democrats.

Reposted bySenator Mark Warner

Rachel Maddow@maddow.bsky.socialOct 22(source)

"A 60-year-old couple earning $85,000 may have to pay $31,000 for a health insurance plan in Kentucky... $28,000 for a plan in Oregon... $44,000 for a plan in Vermont..." www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/...

Health insurance sticker shock begins as shutdown battle over subsidies rages

Many states have shown rising premiums ahead of open enrollment for Affordable Care Act plans. The government shutdown is driven by Democrats and Republicans being far apart on the issue of extended s...

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 22(source)

Today, Virginians will begin to be notified about their 2026 health care premium rate increases. It’s time for Trump to sit down with Democrats and work out a deal to open the government and prevent a health care cliff.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 22(source)

Why won’t Trump even sit down to talk with Democrats?

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 21(source)

Unsurprising. He should resign.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 21(source)

Trump is now openly shaking down HIS OWN JUSTICE DEPARTMENT for hundreds of millions of dollars to line his pockets… while claiming there’s not enough money for Americans’ health care. He has no shame. He is openly and boldly corrupt.

The New York Times

@nytimes.com

Open post ↗

Breaking News: President Trump wants $230 million from the Justice Department for investigating him, people familiar with the matter say. Any settlement might ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him or those in his orbit. nyti.ms/4hmIi5X

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 21(source)

Millions of Americans are struggling to afford the skyrocketing costs of rent, groceries, and utilities. Trump’s response? An AI video of him of him defecating on peaceful protestors.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 21(source)

Of the 22,000 tiles that make up the shuttle’s iconic thermal protection system, as many as 12,000 would have to be removed for disassembly. Once those tiles are removed, there is only a 10% chance of saving each one, since they’re made up of roughly 97% air and 3% silica.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 21(source)

The Trump administration is directing NASA to transfer the space shuttle Discovery to Space Center Houston, a move that NASA and Smithsonian estimate will cost taxpayers at least $120-$150 million.

← Newer postsPosts page 28Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(38)

S. 4467 (119th)
A bill to amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act with respect to nursing faci…
S. 4476 (119th)
A bill to provide for voluntary disclosure by developers and users of artificial intelligenc…
S. 4302 (119th)
A bill to improve services provided to taxpayers by the Internal Revenue Service.
S. 4233 (119th)
A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to codify the Medicare low-wage index…
S.J. Res. 135 (119th)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, Unite…

Cosponsored Bills(165)

S. 4465 (119th)
A bill to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of th…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. 4478 (119th)
A bill to protect the credit of Federal workers during a government shutdown.
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. Res. 721 (119th)
A resolution honoring the life and legacy of Robert S. Mueller, III and commending him for a…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. 4440 (119th)
A bill to modernize clinical trials and remove barriers for participation in clinical trials…
Joined: 2026-04-29
S. 4437 (119th)
A bill to amend the Animal Welfare Act to establish additional requirements for dealers, and…
Joined: 2026-04-29

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

776 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-03-14	—	Confirm nominee	YES	NO	✕↔	Nomination Confirmed (59-40)
2025-03-14	—	End debate	YES	NO	✕↔	Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39)
2025-03-13	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-03-13	S. 331 (119th)	End debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-13	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-03-13	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-03-13	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-03-12	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-12	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-03-11	—	Confirm nominee	YES	YES	✓	Nomination Confirmed (78-19)
2025-03-11	—	End debate	NO	YES	✕	Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20)
2025-03-11	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-03-11	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-10	—	Confirm nominee	YES	NO	✕↔	Nomination Confirmed (67-32)
2025-03-06	S. 331 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NOT_VOTING	YES	—	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-06	—	End debate	YES	NO	✕↔	Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30)
2025-03-06	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-06	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-03-05	S.J. Res. 28 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-03-05	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-05	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-04	S.J. Res. 28 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-03-04	S.J. Res. 3 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	NO	✕↔	Joint Resolution Passed (70-27)
2025-03-04	S.J. Res. 3 (119th)	Begin consideration	YES	NO	✕↔	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-03	S. 9 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-03	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-27	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-27	H.J. Res. 35 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-02-26	S.J. Res. 12 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-26	S.J. Res. 10 (119th)	Approve resolution	YES	YES	✓	Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52)
2025-02-26	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-02-25	—	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-25	S.J. Res. 11 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Joint Resolution Passed (54-44)
2025-02-25	S.J. Res. 11 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42)
2025-02-25	—	Confirm nominee	YES	NO	✕↔	Nomination Confirmed (66-28)
2025-02-24	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24	—	End debate	YES	NO	✕↔	Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21	S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)	Accept House changes	NO	NO	✓	Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21	S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21	S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21	S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21	S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-02-21	S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21	S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21	S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21	—	Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233)	YES	YES	✓	Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-21	S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21	S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (24-76)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 14 / 16Next →