4 years after Roe was overturned, Trump is finding new ways to attack abortion access — now with Moms.gov, his site steering women to anti-abortion centers.
Shameful. I’m calling on Trump and RFK Jr. to stop using taxpayer dollars for their anti-abortion agenda.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts
Elizabeth Warren
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 868
Yes27%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Elizabeth's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 339 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I don’t say this often these days, but Congress actually passed something good.
My bipartisan housing bill to build more housing, lower costs, and stop private equity's housing grab is becoming law.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
The Senate just passed the biggest housing bill in more than 30 years. It’s going to help build more homes, lower the cost of housing, and stop private equity from buying up single family homes.
This is how we put home ownership back within reach.
If Congress doesn't act now, Social Security benefits could be cut by more than 20 percent after 2032.
Senator Bernie Moreno and I have a bipartisan solution: lift the Social Security payroll tax cap.
We need to save Social Security for the next generation. Let's get this done.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Too many Americans can't afford a place to live.
There's more to do, but today we took a step to address that problem, passing the ROAD to Housing Act to make it easier to build & access affordable housing — including my bills to improve access for veterans.
My full statement:
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
BREAKING: For the first time ever, we are stopping private equity from buying up single-family homes in our communities!
This will help make housing more affordable, and I’m proud to be working to make the American Dream of owning a house attainable for more families. 🏠
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
At a time when it feels like we can’t agree on anything. We can agree that a fundamental part of the American Dream is the ability to buy a home.
The bipartisan ROAD to Housing Act addresses the affordable housing crisis in concrete ways.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
HUGE: The Senate just passed the biggest housing bill in 30 years!
Next step: the House needs to get this bill passed!
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Today, the Senate passed the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, the largest housing bill in over 30 years.
This will help boost the housing supply across the nation and crack down on private equity firms buying up single-family homes, so that we can begin to bring down housing costs for families.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Today, we passed the biggest housing bill in nearly 30 years – and Senate Democrats got it done.
I'm proud to have played a key role in crafting this bill that will deliver relief to families in NJ and across this country.
Let's build more housing that YOU can afford.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Thousands of Nevadans are being squeezed by the high costs of home ownership and rent, forcing them to make tough decisions.
I’m proud to have helped pass the bipartisan 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act in the Senate, which is a great first step toward addressing the housing crisis.
I just voted YES on the biggest housing bill in more than 30 years.
This bill will boost housing supply, bring down costs, and — for the first time ever — stop private equity from buying up single-family homes.
The U.S. military was charged $4,361 for a half inch metal pin that costs $46.
Why? Defense contractors—with ties to private equity—are raking in excess profits.
Instead of cracking down, Trump's DoD is inviting private equity to be MORE involved in our national defense.
youtu.be/_Dl8zdB2klQ?...
Donald Trump is the most anti-worker president we've ever had.
Child care workers shouldn't be paid at a lower rate than Uber drivers.
It's time to pay our child care workers a fair and livable wage.
![Graphic
Panel 1: Why aren't there enough child care workers?
Panel 2: There aren't enough workers because those [child care] workers are typically paid at rates lower than Uber drivers.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did%3Aplc%3Aornpixmpy5ts36lh7hmi7wkp/bafkreidcrlkyn4zyrd6vjyw7nsfydglabpjqeagk3taffu6goun4dz3fei@jpeg)
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
America is facing a housing crisis, and it's long past time for Congress to act.
Thanks to @warren.senate.gov and @democrats.senate.gov, the Senate is moving forward the largest housing bill in over 30 years.
Costs are up under Trump this Father’s Day.
Electric shaver? +30.2%
Grill brush? +22.1%
Electric griddle? +16.2%
Your dad deserves better than this.
Ever wonder how private equity works when it takes over your local restaurant, stores at your mall, or even your hospital?
Pretty Woman explains it exactly right.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History868 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
868 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-03 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 26 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26 | YES | NO | ✕ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 33 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33 | YES | NO | ✕ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-42) |
| 2025-04-02 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-02 | S.J. Res. 37 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-03-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-03-27 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-03-26 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (73-25) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-31) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-30) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (63-32) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-33) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (54-46) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (27-73) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (84-16) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.