Trump should be ratcheting up sanctions pressure on Russia, but instead he's halted new designations for months.
Now he’s telling Putin maybe it's better if Russia and Ukraine "fight for a while."
Why won’t he use U.S. leverage to help support Ukraine and end the war?
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts
Elizabeth Warren
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 876
Yes27%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Elizabeth's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 341 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
President Trump just floated sanctioning Ukraine for fighting back against Russia's aggression.
America deserves a leader, not a president who bows to Putin, and every lawmaker should condemn this.
We're in a housing crisis — and Donald Trump is making it worse by slashing housing programs and driving up costs with his reckless tariffs.
I’ve got a plan to build more homes, bring down rent, and cut unnecessary red tape because everyone deserves a place to call home.
youtube.com/shorts/-6QSl...
President Trump's “Big, Beautiful Bill” will make it easier for big banks and giant corporations to cheat you as Republicans try yet again to shut down the CFPB.
I will use every tool at my disposal to defeat this attack on consumers, including challenging it under Senate rules.
Republicans in Congress are trying to rip away health care from millions of Americans unless people "prove that they matter."
Do billionaires need to prove they matter to get trillions in tax breaks?
Or just babies, new moms, and seniors in nursing homes in need of health care?
Just like his first reckless Muslim Ban, Donald Trump is running his same old playbook of hate and division.
This isn’t about making Americans safer — it’s a cruel blanket ban that will rip apart families and hurt our global leadership.
We must fight back.
When a pregnant woman is having a medical emergency, doctors are required by law to provide life-saving care. That includes abortions.
Donald Trump and RFK Jr. think they should be the ones to make decisions in emergency rooms — not your doctor.
This will hurt women everywhere.
Donald Trump’s own Treasury nominee wouldn’t answer basic questions about this administration’s tax policies, so let me explain:
They’re slashing health care coverage for families to fund tax giveaways for billionaires and billionaire corporations.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
The budget bill in the Senate right now is a nightmare for the American People. Join me and Senator Elizabeth Warren as we discuss.
FULL INTERVIEW LINK HERE—> youtu.be/97vTaGGFOIg
A NEW REPORT just revealed that the Big Beautiful Bill is even worse than we thought.
It'll rip away health care from 16 MILLION Americans, just so Jeff Bezos can buy a third yacht.
Donald Trump was going to take money out of grandma's Social Security check for decades-old student loans.
We sounded the alarm. And he backed down—at least for now.
We’re keeping up the fight.
Wells Fargo has a long record of breaking the law—and this past year, was caught violating anti-money laundering, consumer protection, and securities laws.
Lifting the asset cap was a grave mistake. The Fed must show its work and turn over Wells Fargo's exam reports to Congress.
The Congressional Budget Office just confirmed that the Big Beautiful Bill is, in Elon Musk’s words, a “disgusting abomination.”
This exposes Republicans’ lies — this bill will rip health care away from millions of people and jack up the debt to fund tax breaks for billionaires.
The GOP slipped a last-minute carveout for crypto wallets into the GENIUS Act—and now the Trump family is planning to launch one.
I’ll introduce an amendment to close this loophole, but this bill shouldn’t pass without serious anti-corruption fixes.
Republicans snuck an AI regulation BAN into the “Big Beautiful Bill.”
That means companies like Real Page can use AI to get around price fixing laws and RAISE YOUR RENT.
BUT this policy violates the Senate's budget rules.
I'm calling foul — and fighting back to reject it.
The entire Federal Reserve Board should be embarrassed by this outrageous giveaway to one of Wall Street’s most derelict banks.
The Fed must release Wells Fargo’s exam reports for the last five years to the Senate Banking Committee so that Congress can review them.
Nearly 14 MILLION people are estimated to lose their health insurance under Republicans' “big beautiful bill.”
That's like everyone in:
Wyoming
Vermont
Alaska
North Dakota
Montana
Maine
New Hampshire
Hawaii
West Virginia
Idaho
and Nebraska
COMBINED.
"As currently drafted, the GENIUS bill paves another road to financial self-destruction that will undermine the American and global economy."
One author predicted the 2008 crash. The other won a Nobel prize.
Without fixes, this bill shouldn't pass.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
A new report from @warren.senate.gov details Elon Musk’s reign of corruption in Washington, itemizing 130 dodgy dealings in 130 days.
EXCLUSIVE ⤵️
I asked Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the IRS if the President can legally tell the IRS to target a specific taxpayer.
He couldn’t give me a straight answer.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History876 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
876 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (5-94) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.