H. Con. Res. 111 (119th)Bill Overview

Honor 25th Anniversary of September 11 Attacks

Concurrent Resolutiondomestic policy
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jun 30, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Armed Services, Transportation and Infrastructure, Veterans' Affa…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Concurrent ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding statement adopted by both chambers of Congress to mark the 25th anniversary of September 11, honor victims and responders, and encourage remembrance and support for survivors. It expresses Congresss views and gratitude but does not create new law, authorize spending, or require action by the President. As a concurrent resolution, it records the sense and intentions of Congress rather than imposing legal obligations.

Passage rules

Concurrent resolutions are approved by both the House and the Senate but are not sent to the President and do not become law. They are used to state Congresss position, coordinate actions between chambers, or mark observances and carry no binding legal effect.

This concurrent resolution recognizes the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, honors the 2,977 victims and first responders, commends charities supporting survivors and families, honors Flight 93 heroes, and reaffirms the United States’ commitment to defend freedom and remember that day.

It is a non‑binding, ceremonial statement from Congress encouraging remembrance and support for survivors and responders.

Passage90/100

Symbolic, nonbinding resolution with broad appeal and no fiscal or regulatory effects, so high chance of adoption absent scheduling issues.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and enumerates recognitions and encouragements appropriate to a symbolic expression by Congress.

Contention12/100

Liberals worry about symbolic language replacing concrete survivor support

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
CommunitiesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides symbolic national recognition to victims, survivors, first responders, and families.
  • CommunitiesEncourages public remembrance events, potentially increasing community volunteerism and civic participation.
  • Potential benefitAcknowledgment may boost visibility and donations to charities serving survivors and first responders.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIs purely symbolic and does not authorize funding or change federal benefits or services.
  • Potential burdenMay be viewed as insufficient by critics seeking concrete legislative remedies for survivors' needs.
  • Potential burdenCould divert public attention from unresolved policy issues like long-term health care and compensation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals worry about symbolic language replacing concrete survivor support
Progressive85%

Generally supportive of honoring victims, responders, and survivor services, while wary that symbolic resolutions can be used to justify expanded military or surveillance actions.

Would want clear recognition of survivors’ ongoing healthcare and compensation needs and sensitivity to civil liberties and affected communities.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Supportive as a bipartisan, ceremonial commemoration that honors victims and responders while maintaining congressional unity.

Sees value in remembrance but notes the resolution is symbolic and could be strengthened by linking to concrete programs or oversight.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly supportive of commemorating the attacks, honoring heroes, and reaffirming commitment to defend the nation.

Views the resolution as appropriate recognition of sacrifice and resolve against terrorism.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Symbolic, nonbinding resolution with broad appeal and no fiscal or regulatory effects, so high chance of adoption absent scheduling issues.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Scheduling and floor time competition in either chamber
  • Potential attempts to attach substantive amendments
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals worry about symbolic language replacing concrete survivor support

Symbolic, nonbinding resolution with broad appeal and no fiscal or regulatory effects, so high chance of adoption absent scheduling issues.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative concurrent resolution that clearly states its purpose and enumerates recognitions and encouragements appropriate to a symbolic expr…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis