Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in eac…
This bill amends Title 10, U.S. Code to add water‑protection requirements for federal data centers. Within 180 days the Office of Electronic Government must revise minimum requirements to include protections for water resources and the most water‑efficient cooling systems.
Liberals stress environmental and resilience benefits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly effects a substantive change by amending specific statutes to require incorporation of water-protection requirements for data centers and by extending an existing sunset; it assigns responsibility and a short statutory deadline for the required revisions.
This bill amends Title 10, U.S. Code to add water‑protection requirements for federal data centers.
Within 180 days the Office of Electronic Government must revise minimum requirements to include protections for water resources and the most water‑efficient cooling systems.
It extends an existing statutory sunset provision for the data center requirement program (apparently from 2026 to 2031).
Content is narrow, noncontroversial, and administratively implementable, but as a standalone measure it may need to be folded into a larger vehicle to secure enactment.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly effects a substantive change by amending specific statutes to require incorporation of water-protection requirements for data centers and by extending an existing sunset; it assigns responsibility and a short statutory deadline for the required revisions. The bill is concrete about where statutory text changes should be made but leaves key implementation details undefined.
Liberals stress environmental and resilience benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals stress environmental and resilience benefits
Likely broadly supportive: the bill binds federal data centers to protect water resources and integrate water‑efficient cooling, aligning operations with environmental resilience goals.
Seen as a modest, practical climate and conservation measure for government infrastructure.
Likely cautiously supportive as a targeted, incremental reform that addresses a specific environmental vulnerability.
Wants clearer cost estimates, technical guidance, and flexibility for tradeoffs between water and energy efficiency.
Likely skeptical or opposed: views the bill as additional federal specifications that constrain DoD and agency flexibility, impose costs, and expand program authority via sunset extension.
Concerned about readiness and unnecessary regulation.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow, noncontroversial, and administratively implementable, but as a standalone measure it may need to be folded into a larger vehicle to secure enactment.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals stress environmental and resilience benefits
Content is narrow, noncontroversial, and administratively implementable, but as a standalone measure it may need to be folded into a larger…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly effects a substantive change by amending specific statutes to require incorporation of water-protection requirements for data centers and by extending an exis…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.