H.R. 1689 (119th)Bill Overview

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to designate Haiti for temporary protected status.

International Affairs|Caribbean areaForeign labor
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Feb 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 374.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to designate Haiti for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 18 months beginning August 3, 2025, with the phrase “notwithstanding any other provision of law” making the designation mandatory.

Passage50/100

Very narrow, administratively implementable measure increases chances, but immigration partisan dynamics and need for majority/consensus lower overall probability.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention65/100

Humanitarian protection vs enforcement and precedent concerns

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersLocal governments
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersPrevents removal of eligible Haitian nationals during the 18-month designation period.
  • Targeted stakeholdersAllows beneficiaries to seek employment authorization, increasing legal workforce participation.
  • Targeted stakeholdersProvides temporary humanitarian protection for people unable to safely return to Haiti.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates additional DHS administrative and processing costs to implement the TPS designation.
  • Local governmentsMay increase demand on state and local social services, public education, and healthcare systems.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould be perceived as encouraging irregular migration by signaling protection availability.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Humanitarian protection vs enforcement and precedent concerns
Progressive90%

Likely supportive: views the bill as an urgent humanitarian measure protecting Haitian nationals from return amid instability.

Sees TPS designation as consistent with human rights and immigrant protections.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautiously supportive but pragmatic: recognizes humanitarian rationale while wanting clarity on costs, implementation, and legal precedent.

Prefers well-defined administrative procedures.

Split reaction
Conservative15%

Likely opposed: views mandatory TPS designation as weakening immigration enforcement and setting a precedent for congressional micromanagement of immigration policy.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood50/100

Very narrow, administratively implementable measure increases chances, but immigration partisan dynamics and need for majority/consensus lower overall probability.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No statutory cost estimate or budgetary impact in text
  • Existing or prior TPS status for Haiti not referenced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Humanitarian protection vs enforcement and precedent concerns

Very narrow, administratively implementable measure increases chances, but immigration partisan dynamics and need for majority/consensus lo…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to designate Hai…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis