H.R. 2482 (119th)Bill Overview

NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025

Science, Technology, Communications|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresCivil actions and liability
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 31, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill reauthorizes and updates the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), increases its FY2025–2026 appropriations, renames the Assistant Secretary position to Under Secretary and creates a Deputy Under Secretary, and adds an Office of Spectrum Management and an Office of International Affairs.

It consolidates or repeals certain reporting requirements into a single annual consolidated report, makes technical and conforming statutory edits, and clarifies executive-branch coordination of views presented to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

Passage65/100

Administrative reauthorization with modest funding and clear implementation language tends to advance; some procedural and policy scrutiny in Senate could reduce odds.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative/operational reauthorization that uses direct statutory amendment to implement organizational changes, reporting consolidation, and funding authorization for the NTIA. It provides detailed, citation-specific edits, clear role and duty assignments, and concrete reporting timelines.

Contention50/100

Executive coordination language: risk to FCC independence versus needed policy coherence

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersProvides two-year appropriations of $57 million, supporting NTIA operations and programs.
  • Federal agenciesElevates leadership to an Under Secretary and Deputy, strengthening NTIA interagency authority and visibility.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates an Office of Spectrum Management to centralize spectrum coordination and technical policy work.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesRaises Executive Schedule pay and creates senior posts, increasing federal personnel costs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersExpanded executive-branch coordination language could be viewed as increasing influence over FCC-related matters.
  • Targeted stakeholdersNew offices and duties may increase administrative workload for agencies and external stakeholders.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Executive coordination language: risk to FCC independence versus needed policy coherence
Progressive85%

Likely broadly supportive of strengthening NTIA capacity for spectrum management and international engagement.

Views consolidated reporting as sensible government efficiency, but would watch for impacts on FCC independence, equity, and privacy protections in spectrum and international policy work.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally supportive of administrative modernization, clearer leadership, and streamlined reporting, while cautious about cost, implementation details, and maintaining FCC independence.

Would seek clear oversight, performance metrics, and assurance against mission creep.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical of expanding federal bureaucracy and elevating NTIA authority.

Concerned the bill strengthens executive control over views presented to the FCC and increases federal staffing and pay without clear limits or demonstrated necessity.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood65/100

Administrative reauthorization with modest funding and clear implementation language tends to advance; some procedural and policy scrutiny in Senate could reduce odds.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Absence of a public CBO cost estimate in text
  • Potential objections about executive coordination with the FCC
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Executive coordination language: risk to FCC independence versus needed policy coherence

Administrative reauthorization with modest funding and clear implementation language tends to advance; some procedural and policy scrutiny…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative/operational reauthorization that uses direct statutory amendment to implement organizational changes, reporting consolidation, and…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis