Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Amends the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to make youth sports facilities explicitly eligible for certain economic development grants.
Adds project goals including addressing sedentary lifestyles, serving low-income and rural communities, aiding areas with opioid use or violence, promoting economic development and job creation.
Changes broaden eligible activities and specify target populations for facility projects.
Content is narrow and broadly appealing, increasing chances; absence of funding language and procedural hurdles reduce likelihood.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that integrates cleanly into existing statute but provides limited operational, fiscal, definitional, and accountability detail.
Left emphasizes health equity and access; right emphasizes federal overreach and cost.
Left emphasizes health equity and access; right emphasizes federal overreach and cost.
Likely broadly supportive because the bill targets health equity, underserved children, and rural communities.
Views youth sports facilities as preventive health, community safety, and economic development investments.
Will seek guarantees on equitable access, inclusion, and that funds flow to high-need communities rather than commercial actors.
Generally favorable if the program is targeted, cost-effective, and accountable.
Sees potential local economic and health benefits but wants clear metrics, oversight, and fiscal restraint.
Will press for competitive grants, matching requirements, and performance evaluation.
Skeptical of expanding federal eligibility and new spending mandates.
Prefers state, local, and private solutions for sports facilities.
May support rural job claims but worries about federal overreach, bureaucracy, and long-term costs.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and broadly appealing, increasing chances; absence of funding language and procedural hurdles reduce likelihood.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes health equity and access; right emphasizes federal overreach and cost.
Content is narrow and broadly appealing, increasing chances; absence of funding language and procedural hurdles reduce likelihood.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment that integrates cleanly into existing statute but provides limited operational, fiscal, definitional, and accountability d…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.