- Local governmentsTransfers local control allowing Perry County to use the parcel for education and youth development programs.
- Local governmentsMay enable local capital improvements and maintenance funded by county or local partners.
- Federal agenciesEliminates ongoing federal management responsibility and associated administrative costs for the small parcel.
To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey a parcel of property of the Forest Service to Perry County, Arkansas, and for other purposes.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 248.
This bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey a specific 0.81-acre Forest Service parcel in Perryville, Arkansas, to Perry County if the county requests it within 180 days.
The transfer would be by quitclaim deed, for no monetary consideration, subject to valid existing rights and a Secretary-controlled reversion if not used for public purposes.
Perry County must pay transfer costs including survey, environmental, and historic-preservation analyses.
Narrow, administrative property transfer with limited fiscal impact and safeguards; historically such bills have a high chance absent procedural obstacles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped conveyance statute that is generally well‑constructed: it identifies the parcel, specifies the requesting party and timeframe to request, defines key conveyance terms, assigns costs to the recipient, and includes a reversion remedy and references to relevant statutes (CERCLA/NHPA).
Environmental liability: liberals emphasize CERCLA risks; conservatives downplay them.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Federal agenciesConveys federal land without monetary consideration, reducing federal property assets and potential revenue.
- CountiesQuitclaim deed and no CERCLA warranty may shift environmental liability risks to the county.
- Local governmentsCounty must bear survey, environmental, and historic compliance costs, increasing local fiscal burden.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Environmental liability: liberals emphasize CERCLA risks; conservatives downplay them.
Generally supportive of transferring underused federal property for public, community-focused purposes, but cautious about environmental and equity protections.
Concerns center on the lack of CERCLA warranty, quitclaim deed language, and ensuring the site actually serves local public needs.
Pragmatic approval likely: small parcel, local government pays costs, and reversion protects federal interest.
Wants clear environmental and legal steps to minimize downstream costs and ambiguity.
Favorable: supports shrinking federal footprint and empowering local governments to use property for public services.
Views county-paid costs and quitclaim conveyance as appropriate limits on federal responsibility.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, administrative property transfer with limited fiscal impact and safeguards; historically such bills have a high chance absent procedural obstacles.
- No CBO or cost estimate included
- Unknown environmental or contamination history of parcel
Recent votes on the bill.
Passed
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Go deeper than the headline read.
Environmental liability: liberals emphasize CERCLA risks; conservatives downplay them.
Narrow, administrative property transfer with limited fiscal impact and safeguards; historically such bills have a high chance absent proce…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped conveyance statute that is generally well‑constructed: it identifies the parcel, specifies the requesting party and timeframe to request, defines…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.