H.R. 3317 (119th)Bill Overview

Honoring Civil Servants Killed in the Line of Duty Act

Government Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
May 9, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, Veterans' Affairs, Transportation and Infrastru…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill establishes a new federal death gratuity (5 U.S.C. 5571) of $100,000 indexed annually to CPI for federal employees killed in the line of duty, raises and indexes funeral expense payments to $8,800, updates related death-gratuity rules across Foreign Service and military statutory provisions, makes these payments tax-free, clarifies beneficiary order, and allows agencies to request emergency supplemental appropriations for large incidents.

It extends coverage to specific groups (FAA, TSA, VHA, Foreign Service) and specifies exclusions (willful misconduct, self-intent, intoxication).

Several existing provisions are repealed or conformed, and many amendments apply to deaths occurring on or after enactment.

Passage55/100

Moderate to strong policy consensus and narrow purpose increase chance, while recurring fiscal cost and intercommittee jurisdiction reduce speed.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified statutory revision that creates and expands entitlement-like gratuities across federal law. It provides concrete legal mechanisms (new section, specific dollar amounts with CPI adjustments, beneficiary order, tax treatment) and integrates those changes into multiple existing statutes.

Contention55/100

Support level: liberals strongly support; conservatives worry about cost

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies · Workers
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesProvides larger, inflation‑adjusted cash payments to families of federal employees killed in the line of duty.
  • Targeted stakeholdersExpands coverage to TSA, FAA, VHA, Foreign Service, and certain military‑related deaths, increasing beneficiary eligibi…
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases funeral reimbursement to $8,800, indexed annually, reducing immediate out‑of‑pocket survivor expenses.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal outlays and could raise long‑term fiscal costs depending on deaths and claims volume.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSupplemental appropriations require congressional action, which could delay additional funding despite authorization.
  • WorkersCreates administrative workload for agencies, the Secretary of Labor, and Inspectors General to make determinations.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Support level: liberals strongly support; conservatives worry about cost
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive.

The bill increases and indexes survivor payments, expands covered employee groups, and makes payments tax-free, aligning with priorities to support families and public servants.

Some progressive advocates may press for broader coverage of contractors or guaranteed separate funding.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but pragmatic.

The bill modernizes survivor benefits and clarifies procedures, but raises reasonable fiscal and implementation questions about funding sources, offsets, and administrative processes.

Moderates will seek CBO scoring and clear implementation guidance.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Mixed to somewhat opposed.

Supportive of honoring fallen civil servants, but concerned about new recurring costs, CPI indexing, expanded entitlements, and relying on agency salary appropriations.

Prefers tighter eligibility, funding discipline, and limits on automatic indexing.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood55/100

Moderate to strong policy consensus and narrow purpose increase chance, while recurring fiscal cost and intercommittee jurisdiction reduce speed.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No official cost estimate or score in bill text
  • Potential scope of eligible deaths and fiscal exposure
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Support level: liberals strongly support; conservatives worry about cost

Moderate to strong policy consensus and narrow purpose increase chance, while recurring fiscal cost and intercommittee jurisdiction reduce…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified statutory revision that creates and expands entitlement-like gratuities across federal law. It provides concrete legal mechanisms (new section, sp…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis