Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, i…
This bill amends the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 to create a Task Force-led demonstration program addressing the invasive golden mussel.
It directs research, monitoring, control, eradication, education, and technical assistance, prioritizing the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta and other infested or at-risk U.S. waters.
The bill establishes a competitive grant program for state/local entities, universities, nonprofits, and industry, allows technology transfer agreements, and authorizes $15 million per year for fiscal years 2026–2030.
Modest, noncontroversial invasive-species bill with limited authorized funding has reasonable bipartisan appeal but still requires committee approval and future appropriations.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory framework to create a demonstration and grant program addressing golden mussel control and eradication, integrates into the existing aquatic nuisance statute, and provides explicit funding authorization. The bill supplies high‑level mechanisms and some implementation timing but leaves significant operational, accountability, and risk‑mitigation details to subsequent Task Force action or subordinate guidance.
Liberals emphasize environmental safeguards and public oversight
Liberals emphasize environmental safeguards and public oversight
Generally supportive because the bill funds science-based control, protects ecosystems, and assists affected communities.
Concerns focus on ensuring environmental safeguards, public oversight, and limiting private profit motives that could undercut transparency.
Supportive of a targeted, time-limited federal program that funds research and local response, while wanting clear metrics, oversight, and interagency coordination.
Views the program as pragmatic if properly implemented and monitored.
Mixed: supports protecting water infrastructure and commerce from invasive species but wary of added federal programs, inspection mandates, and new regulatory burdens.
Prefers state-led actions and limits on federal authority and spending.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest, noncontroversial invasive-species bill with limited authorized funding has reasonable bipartisan appeal but still requires committee approval and future appropriations.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize environmental safeguards and public oversight
Modest, noncontroversial invasive-species bill with limited authorized funding has reasonable bipartisan appeal but still requires committe…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory framework to create a demonstration and grant program addressing golden mussel control and eradication, integrates into the existing aqu…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.