The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R.…
The bill is the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026.
It provides detailed FY2026 funding levels for DHS components (CBP, ICE, TSA, Coast Guard, Secret Service, CISA, FEMA, USCG acquisitions, FEMA disaster relief, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Science & Technology, Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers, and others), specifies procurement and availability periods, and attaches many reporting, oversight, policy riders, restrictions, and transfer/reprogramming rules governing how funds may be used.
Must-pass appropriations subject to heavy negotiation; content includes controversial policy riders that reduce near-term enactment probability without significant compromise.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this appropriations act is highly detailed and operationally specific: it provides line-item funding, availability periods, statutory cross-references, and extensive implementation and oversight requirements consistent with an administrative/operational appropriations instrument.
Progressives emphasize risks of expanded enforcement and detention funding.
Progressives emphasize risks of expanded enforcement and detention funding.
Likely critical of the bill’s large enforcement and detention funding while welcoming strengthened oversight, reporting, and some humanitarian protections.
Concerned funding and authorities for ICE, CBP, and border assets may expand detention and enforcement capacity.
Supports body-worn camera funding, limits on restraints for pregnant people, and enhanced Inspector General reporting, but sees those as partial mitigations.
Sees the bill as a comprehensive, operationally detailed DHS funding bill that balances readiness, border enforcement, and disaster response with increased oversight and reporting.
Appreciates explicit restrictions on reprogramming and clear briefing requirements, while noting potential cost and implementation trade-offs.
Views many provisions as pragmatic but wants clarity on costs and metrics.
Overall supportive because the bill funds robust border security, ICE and CBP operations, Coast Guard acquisitions, and law enforcement resources.
Values many provisions that prohibit new border crossing fees, restrict reprogramming, and ensure enforcement capacity.
May object to some oversight burdens but generally sees the bill as strengthening homeland security capabilities.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Must-pass appropriations subject to heavy negotiation; content includes controversial policy riders that reduce near-term enactment probability without significant compromise.
On Passage
On Motion to Recommit
Progressives emphasize risks of expanded enforcement and detention funding.
Must-pass appropriations subject to heavy negotiation; content includes controversial policy riders that reduce near-term enactment probabi…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this appropriations act is highly detailed and operationally specific: it provides line-item funding, availability periods, statutory cross-references, and extensive implementa…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.