H. Res. 1172 (119th)Bill Overview

Providing for the expulsion of Representative Tony Gonzales from the United States House of Representatives.

Congress|Congress
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 14, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ethics.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution (H.

Res. 1172) would expel Representative Tony Gonzales from the U.S. House of Representatives pursuant to Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 of the Constitution.

The resolution cites Gonzales’ admission of a sexual relationship with a staffer he supervised, published text messages alleging unwelcome sexual advances, a second former staffer’s allegations, and the death of a former staffer.

Passage40/100

Clear factual allegations and admission increase support odds, but high procedural threshold and political sensitivity keep overall chances modest.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-focused administrative/operational resolution that clearly states the alleged misconduct and invokes the constitutional authority to expel a named Member. It supplies sufficient factual findings and legal grounding for floor consideration while leaving procedural mechanics to standard House practice.

Contention72/100

Accountability vs due process: left centers on accountability; right demands fuller process

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersDemonstrates House enforcement of ethical rules and standards for Members.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSignals protection of staff safety and deterrence of supervisory sexual misconduct.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay restore some public confidence in institutional accountability after misconduct revelations.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersConstituents may be left without representation until a special election occurs.
  • Targeted stakeholdersSets or reinforces precedent for expulsion based on misconduct absent criminal convictions.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould be portrayed as a tool for political or partisan retaliation in future cases.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Accountability vs due process: left centers on accountability; right demands fuller process
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive of expulsion as appropriate disciplinary action for admitted violations and harm to staff.

Emphasizes accountability, staff safety, and institutional integrity over protecting a Member who admitted misconduct.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive but cautious; favors accountability while insisting on clear procedure and evidence.

Wants to balance protecting staff and institutional norms with due process and precedent concerns.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Skeptical of expulsion absent criminal charges or exhaustive due process.

Emphasizes caution about removing a duly elected representative and potential abuse of expulsion power for political ends.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Clear factual allegations and admission increase support odds, but high procedural threshold and political sensitivity keep overall chances modest.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Degree of bipartisan support among House members
  • Existence or timing of an Ethics Committee report
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Accountability vs due process: left centers on accountability; right demands fuller process

Clear factual allegations and admission increase support odds, but high procedural threshold and political sensitivity keep overall chances…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-focused administrative/operational resolution that clearly states the alleged misconduct and invokes the constitutional authority to expel a named Member. I…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis