H. Res. 352 (119th)Bill Overview

Calling on elected officials and civil society leaders to counter antisemitism and educate the public on the contributions of the Jewish American community.

Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues|Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommunity life and organization
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This House resolution calls on elected officials, faith leaders, and civil society to condemn antisemitism, educate the public about Jewish American contributions, and ensure the safety and dignity of American Jews.

It cites a reported rise in antisemitic incidents since October 7, 2023, lists examples of Jewish-American inventors and contributors, and urges executive, state, and local leaders to uplift Jewish stories.

The measure is a non‑binding resolution requesting awareness, education, and protective steps rather than creating new law or funding.

Passage10/100

As a nonbinding House resolution it is unlikely to produce binding law; content is broadly acceptable and easy to adopt symbolically.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a symbolic House resolution that clearly identifies a problem and urges broad actors to act, but it intentionally stops short of prescribing detailed mechanisms, funding, or oversight.

Contention12/100

Progressives worry about conflating Israel criticism with antisemitism

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Local governmentsLocal governments
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersReinforces a government-level public condemnation of antisemitism and Jew-directed hate.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay prompt new educational efforts highlighting Jewish American historical and cultural contributions.
  • Local governmentsCould encourage state and local leaders to increase security at synagogues, schools, and community centers.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersThe resolution is symbolic and contains no funding or binding enforcement mechanisms.
  • Local governmentsLocal governments or institutions may face increased administrative duties to implement educational actions.
  • Local governmentsEfforts to increase security could divert local public safety resources to protective measures.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives worry about conflating Israel criticism with antisemitism
Progressive85%

Likely broadly supportive because it condemns antisemitism and promotes civil rights and education.

May seek assurances that the resolution will not be used to suppress legitimate criticism of Israeli government policy or to undermine free speech on campuses.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally supportive; views the resolution as an appropriate, nonbinding condemnation of hate and a call for public education.

Wants clearer implementation steps, measurable outcomes, and respect for civil liberties.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely strongly supportive of condemning antisemitism and promoting Jewish heritage.

May press for stronger security language, law enforcement support, and clear protections against violent threats.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood10/100

As a nonbinding House resolution it is unlikely to produce binding law; content is broadly acceptable and easy to adopt symbolically.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Potential linkage to broader Israel/Palestine debates
  • Responses from stakeholders interpreting educational guidance
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives worry about conflating Israel criticism with antisemitism

As a nonbinding House resolution it is unlikely to produce binding law; content is broadly acceptable and easy to adopt symbolically.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a symbolic House resolution that clearly identifies a problem and urges broad actors to act, but it intentionally stops short of prescribing detailed mec…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis