- Potential benefitExpedites floor consideration of multiple bills by waiving procedural barriers (first reading, points of order) and set…
- VeteransCreates predictability for Members and stakeholders about amendment availability and debate time, which can focus delib…
- Federal agenciesBy permitting consideration of bills addressing energy supply chains, reliable generation standards, and interagency co…
Rule for H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, and 3 others
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
This resolution is a House rule that sets the terms for how the House will debate, amend, and vote on six specific bills. It waives many procedural objections, adopts specified committee substitute texts as the working bills, limits debate time, and restricts which amendments may be offered, while ordering final passage procedures with only a single motion to recommit allowed. It only governs House floor procedure and does not create law or apply to the Senate or the President.
As a House simple resolution, it is adopted by the House alone (a majority vote) and is not sent to the President. It gives the Speaker authority to convene the Committee of the Whole, waives points of order, and confines amendments to those printed in the Rules Committee report.
H.
Res. 936 is a House rules resolution that sets terms for floor consideration of several bills: H.R. 3898 (targeted reforms to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act / waters of the United States), H.R. 3383 (amendments to the Investment Company Act regarding closed-end companies investing in private funds), H.R. 3638 (directing the Department of Energy to prepare periodic supply-chain assessments for electricity generation and transmission), H.R. 3628 (amending PURPA to add a state standard related to consideration of reliable generation), H.R. 3668 (promoting interagency coordination on certain Natural Gas Act section 3 authorizations), and S. 1071 (requiring disinterment of the remains of Fernando V.
Cota).
As a House rules resolution, H. Res. 936 is a procedural instrument that governs floor consideration and is not a lawmaking text; it does not become law. Historically such resolutions are often adopted in the House when the majority supports them, but they do not go to the Senate or receive presidential signature. Thus the chance this text itself becomes law is near zero, although its adoption would enable floor consideration of several substantive bills whose own prospects are separate and variable.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified rules/consideration resolution that clearly identifies the bills to be considered and provides precise procedural mechanics, sequencing, and references to House rules to implement floor consideration.
Process vs. substance: liberals sharply object to waived points of order and limited amendments; conservatives praise those same procedural limits for efficiency.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenWaiving points of order and restricting amendments limits procedural avenues for extended debate, amendment, or legal a…
- Local governmentsFast-track consideration of bills that alter environmental and energy regulatory frameworks (e.g., WOTUS changes, PURPA…
- Permitting processPermitting closed-end funds greater authority to invest in private funds (as addressed in H.R. 3383) may raise investor…
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Process vs. substance: liberals sharply object to waived points of order and limited amendments; conservatives praise those same procedural limits for efficiency.
A mainstream progressive would view this resolution mostly through two lenses: process and substance.
Procedurally they would be concerned that the rule waives points of order and tightly limits amendments, reducing minority and public input.
Substantively, they would likely oppose several underlying measures (particularly the WOTUS changes, the PURPA reliability standard if it favors fossil generation, and eased natural gas authorization coordination) as potential rollbacks of environmental and public-interest protections, though they may welcome the DOE supply-chain reporting requirement and the veterans-related S.1071 as non-controversial.
A pragmatic moderate would treat this resolution largely as a procedural vehicle that bundles several disparate bills.
They would appreciate orderly floor management and inclusion of technical measures like DOE supply-chain reporting and the veterans matter, but they would be wary of the broad waivers of points of order and the closed amendment processes that limit deliberation.
On substance they would evaluate each underlying bill on its merits: supply-chain reporting and the veterans provision are low controversy; WOTUS, PURPA, and Natural Gas Act coordination raise tradeoffs between environmental protection and energy reliability that merit careful amendments.
A mainstream conservative would generally view H.
Res. 936 favorably as it advances multiple deregulatory or pro-energy bills and limits procedural obstacles that can delay passage.
The rule’s waiver of points of order and tight amendment lists are assets because they prevent obstruction and allow the majority to advance its legislative priorities efficiently.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a House rules resolution, H. Res. 936 is a procedural instrument that governs floor consideration and is not a lawmaking text; it does not become law. Historically such resolutions are often adopted in the House when the majority supports them, but they do not go to the Senate or receive presidential signature. Thus the chance this text itself becomes law is near zero, although its adoption would enable floor consideration of several substantive bills whose own prospects are separate and variable.
- Whether the House majority supporting the resolution will be unified enough to adopt it without significant defections; rules votes can sometimes be close if underlying bills are controversial.
- Specific reactions to the individual underlying bills (e.g., waters of the United States reforms, energy and utility standards) could affect the floor atmosphere when each bill is considered; contentious underlying content could lead to attempts to modify or delay consideration despite the rule.
Recent votes on the bill.
The House formally adopted this resolution. A resolution applies only to the House and does not require the other chamber's approval or the President's signature — this vote settles the matter.
What is a approve resolution?Hide explanation
A resolution is a formal statement of opinion or decision by the chamber.
Debate was cut short. The House will proceed directly to a vote on the underlying question.
What is a end debate now?Hide explanation
In the House, this ends debate and forces an immediate vote on the main question.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Process vs. substance: liberals sharply object to waived points of order and limited amendments; conservatives praise those same procedural…
As a House rules resolution, H. Res. 936 is a procedural instrument that governs floor consideration and is not a lawmaking text; it does n…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified rules/consideration resolution that clearly identifies the bills to be considered and provides precise procedural mechanics, sequencing, and refer…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.