Held at the desk.
This resolution sets the congressional budget for fiscal year 2026 and recommended budgetary levels for fiscal years 2027 through 2035, including totals for revenues, spending, deficits, and debt. It assigns those totals across major functions of government, gives committees numerical targets, and includes instructions and reserve funds for drafting reconciliation legislation. The resolution is not a law; it serves as a blueprint Congress uses to guide appropriations and to enforce budget-related rules and points of order during consideration of bills.
A concurrent budget resolution is adopted by both the House and Senate but is not sent to the President and does not have the force of law. It contains reconciliation instructions that require certain committees to report legislation by May 15, 2026; those reconciliation bills in the Senate are subject to special budget procedures that limit debate and can be passed with a simple majority.
This concurrent budget resolution sets aggregate budget targets for FY2026 and fiscal years 2027–2035: revenues, new budget authority, outlays, deficits, public debt, and functional-category allocations (defense, health, Medicare, transportation, etc.).
It includes reconciliation instructions to Homeland Security and Judiciary committees in both Chambers (each allowed up to $70 billion deficit-increasing changes for 2026–2035), reserve funds authorizing budget adjustments for certain immigration enforcement measures, and procedural provisions for enforcement, administrative expenses for Social Security and USPS, emergency designations, and committee adjustment authorities.
As a concurrent budget resolution it must be agreed by both Houses (not presidentially signed); technical nature helps, but high ideological content and complexity lower bipartisan approval odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this concurrent resolution is detailed, specific, and well‑structured: it sets explicit fiscal aggregates and functional allocations, specifies reconciliation instructions and reserve fund authorities, and integrates with existing budget statutes and enforcement mechanisms.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights and social spending risks from immigration focus.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights and social spending risks from immigration focus.
Views the resolution as a conservative-leaning fiscal framework that prioritizes defense and immigration enforcement mechanisms while accepting large deficits.
Concerned it creates procedural paths for punitive immigration measures and limits room for progressive investment.
Sees the resolution primarily as a procedural framework that clarifies budget totals and committee authorities.
Generally pragmatic but wary of the size of projected deficits and the partisan potential of reconciliation instructions focused on homeland security and judiciary matters.
Likely supportive because the resolution funds robust national defense and creates explicit reconciliation pathways for tougher immigration and border-enforcement policies.
Views reserve funds for deportation of violent illegal entrants as a policy priority.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a concurrent budget resolution it must be agreed by both Houses (not presidentially signed); technical nature helps, but high ideological content and complexity lower bipartisan approval odds.
The House formally adopted this resolution. A resolution applies only to the House and does not require the other chamber's approval or the President's signature — this vote settles the matter.
A resolution is a formal statement of opinion or decision by the chamber.
The Senate accepted the House's changes. Both chambers now agree — the bill heads to the President.
This amendment was rejected and will not be included in the bill.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights and social spending risks from immigration focus.
As a concurrent budget resolution it must be agreed by both Houses (not presidentially signed); technical nature helps, but high ideologica…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this concurrent resolution is detailed, specific, and well‑structured: it sets explicit fiscal aggregates and functional allocations, specifies reconciliation instructions and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.