Held at the desk.
This concurrent budget resolution sets aggregate budget targets for FY2026 and fiscal years 2027–2035: revenues, new budget authority, outlays, deficits, public debt, and functional-category allocations (defense, health, Medicare, transportation, etc.).
It includes reconciliation instructions to Homeland Security and Judiciary committees in both Chambers (each allowed up to $70 billion deficit-increasing changes for 2026–2035), reserve funds authorizing budget adjustments for certain immigration enforcement measures, and procedural provisions for enforcement, administrative expenses for Social Security and USPS, emergency designations, and committee adjustment authorities.
As a concurrent budget resolution it must be agreed by both Houses (not presidentially signed); technical nature helps, but high ideological content and complexity lower bipartisan approval odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this concurrent resolution is detailed, specific, and well‑structured: it sets explicit fiscal aggregates and functional allocations, specifies reconciliation instructions and reserve fund authorities, and integrates with existing budget statutes and enforcement mechanisms.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights and social spending risks from immigration focus.
Progressives emphasize civil-rights and social spending risks from immigration focus.
Views the resolution as a conservative-leaning fiscal framework that prioritizes defense and immigration enforcement mechanisms while accepting large deficits.
Concerned it creates procedural paths for punitive immigration measures and limits room for progressive investment.
Sees the resolution primarily as a procedural framework that clarifies budget totals and committee authorities.
Generally pragmatic but wary of the size of projected deficits and the partisan potential of reconciliation instructions focused on homeland security and judiciary matters.
Likely supportive because the resolution funds robust national defense and creates explicit reconciliation pathways for tougher immigration and border-enforcement policies.
Views reserve funds for deportation of violent illegal entrants as a policy priority.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a concurrent budget resolution it must be agreed by both Houses (not presidentially signed); technical nature helps, but high ideological content and complexity lower bipartisan approval odds.
On the Concurrent Resolution S.Con.Res. 33
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 5333 to S.Con.Res. 33 (No short title on file)
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 5336 to S.Con.Res. 33 (No short title on file)
Progressives emphasize civil-rights and social spending risks from immigration focus.
As a concurrent budget resolution it must be agreed by both Houses (not presidentially signed); technical nature helps, but high ideologica…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this concurrent resolution is detailed, specific, and well‑structured: it sets explicit fiscal aggregates and functional allocations, specifies reconciliation instructions and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.